Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action
Holding
An amendment to Michigan"s constitution that prohibits state universities from considering race as part of its admissions process does not violate the Constitution"s Equal Protection Clause.
Judgment
Reversed, 6-2, in an opinion by Anthony McLeod Kennedy on Apr 22, 2014. The Chief Justice and Justice Alito join the opinion in full. Justice Scalia filed an opinion concurring in the judgement, in which Justice Thomas joined. Justice Breyer also filed an opinion concurring in the judgement. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Ginsburg joined. (Kagan, J., recused)
Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents.
Issue: Whether a state violates the Equal Protection Clause by amending its constitution to prohibit race- and sex-based discrimination or preferential treatment in public-university admissions decisions. (Kagan, J., recused.)
Recommended Citation: Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/schuette-v-coalition-to-defend-affirmative-action/