No, Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not dissent in Obergefell — and other things ChatGPT gets wrong about the Supreme Court

SCOTUStalk

More News

No, Ruth Bader Ginsburg did not dissent in Obergefell — and other things ChatGPT gets wrong about the Supreme Court

SCOTUStalk

More News

Arthrex seeks second Supreme Court intervention in patent clash

A “DIG” on attorney-client privilege: Why the court decided not to decide In re Grand Jury

In veterans’ benefits case, court says Congress chose a firm rule over a flexible standard

The morning read for Friday, Jan. 27

The morning read for Thursday, Jan. 26

The morning read for Wednesday, Jan. 25

The morning read for Tuesday, Jan. 24

Justices request federal government’s views on Texas and Florida social-media laws

Arthrex seeks second Supreme Court intervention in patent clash

A “DIG” on attorney-client privilege: Why the court decided not to decide In re Grand Jury

In veterans’ benefits case, court says Congress chose a firm rule over a flexible standard

The morning read for Friday, Jan. 27

The morning read for Thursday, Jan. 26

The morning read for Wednesday, Jan. 25

The morning read for Tuesday, Jan. 24

Justices request federal government’s views on Texas and Florida social-media laws

SCOTUS FOCUS

PETITIONS OF THE WEEK

SCOTUS FOCUS

OPINION ANALYSIS

WHAT WE'RE READING

WHAT WE'RE READING

WHAT WE'RE READING

WHAT WE'RE READING

SCOTUS NEWS

Calendar

Breaking News

SCOTUS FOCUS

PETITIONS OF THE WEEK

SCOTUS FOCUS

OPINION ANALYSIS

WHAT WE'RE READING

WHAT WE'RE READING

WHAT WE'RE READING

WHAT WE'RE READING

SCOTUS NEWS

Calendar

STATISTICAL SNAPSHOT: 2021-22 TERM

Archives

By James Romoser on Jan. 26 at 10:57 a.m.

We asked ChatGPT, the new A.I. chatbot, 50 questions about the Supreme Court. It answered just 21 of them correctly.

ChatGPT wrongly claimed that Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg opposed the federal right to same-sex marriage.

By Kalvis Golde on Jan. 27 at 11:03 a.m.

A weekly look at new and notable petitions seeking Supreme Court review. This week: a sequel in a struggle over separation of powers.

By Stephen Gillers on Jan. 25 at 9:30 a.m.

Shortly after hearing argument about expanding the scope of attorney-client privilege, the justices dismissed the case as “improvidently granted.”

By Yelena Duterte on Jan. 23 at 2:24 p.m.

In Arellano v. McDonough, the court held that a one-year timeframe to seek retroactive disability benefits is a hard-and-fast deadline.

After more than three decades covering the Supreme Court, Marcia Coyle has announced her retirement from the National Law Journal. Amy sits down with Coyle to discuss her career, her book, and how covering the court has changed over the years.

FIND MORE EPISODES

By SCOTUSblog on Jan 27, 2023 at 9:35 am

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Friday morning read:

Kavanaugh says he’s ‘optimistic’ about the Supreme Court and trashes US News law school rankings (Ariane de Vogue & Devan Cole, CNN)
The New Kavanaugh Documentary Changes Nothing (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate)
When the chief justice himself was the Supreme Court leak (Jeffrey Boutwell, The Baltimore Sun)
The “Special Treatment” Supreme Court Justices Got During The Leak Investigation Should Be Investigated, A Group Told Congress (David Mack, BuzzFeed)
Interview: Josh Gerstein (Elise Spenner, High School SCOTUS)

By SCOTUSblog on Jan 26, 2023 at 10:00 am

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Thursday morning read:

Two Supreme Court Cases That Could Break the Internet (Isaac Chotiner, The New Yorker)
Supreme Court Punt in Tax Fine Case Leaves Uncertainty in Wake (Lydia Wheeler & Jeffery Leon, Bloomberg Law)
Bipartisan Supreme Court Reform Is Not a Pipe Dream (Simon Lazarus, The New Republic)
Oil industry takes offshore fracking case to Supreme Court (Niina H. Farah, E&E News)
Terence Andrus Deserved Better Than What the Supreme Court Gave Him (Yvette Borja, Balls and Strikes)

By SCOTUSblog on Jan 25, 2023 at 9:58 am

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Wednesday morning read:

Americans Like the Supreme Court More, But Still Not That Much (Greg Stohr, Bloomberg Law)
Navy christens massive ship bearing name of legendary Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren (Gary Robbins, The San Diego Union-Tribune)
Student Loan Forgiveness: Will Comments on Dept. of Ed Website Opposing Biden’s Plan Impact the Supreme Court’s Decision? (Vance Cariaga, Yahoo! Finance)
Hawaii Lawmakers Seek Shields Against Supreme Court Ruling On Abortion, Guns (Blaze Lovell, Honolulu Civil Beat)
We Still Don’t Know Who Leaked Dobbs. Good! (Alex Shephard, The New Republic)

By SCOTUSblog on Jan 24, 2023 at 9:30 am

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles, commentary, and other noteworthy links related to the Supreme Court. To suggest a piece for us to consider, email us at roundup@scotusblog.com.

Here’s the Tuesday morning read:

Supreme Court finally issues first ruling of term (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News)
U.S. Supreme Court’s Gorsuch in dissent calls $2.17 mln tax penalty excessive (Nate Raymond, Reuters)
It’s Not Your Imagination — The Supreme Court is Less Efficient (Adam Feldman, Empirical SCOTUS)
What Power Does Amid Uncertainty (Dahlia Lithwick, Slate)
Bathroom Bans for Transgender Youths Are Poised for Supreme Court Review (Adam Liptak, The New York Times)

By Amy Howe on Jan 23, 2023 at 4:44 pm

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Biden administration for its views on a pair of controversial social-media laws enacted in Texas and Florida. Passed in response to beliefs that social-media platforms were censoring their users, particularly those expressing conservative political views, both states’ laws seek to regulate the content-moderation policies of social-media companies like Facebook and Twitter.

The justices asked the solicitor general to weigh in on NetChoice v. Paxton (a pending petition on the Texas law) and NetChoice v. Moody and Moody v. NetChoice (two pending petitions on the Florida law). The requests came on a list of orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday.

January 2022

February 2022

March 2022

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
		1	2 Egbert v. Boule (21-147) oral_arguments	3 Opinions opinions	4 Conference private_conferences Opinions opinions	5
6	7 today_at_the_court On Monday, the court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term starting at 10 a.m. Orders orders Opinions opinions	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18 Conference private_conferences	19
20	21 Orders orders Morgan V. Sundance, Inc. (21-328) oral_arguments Berger v. North Carolina State Conf. of NAACP (21-248) oral_arguments	22 Golan v. Saada (20-1034) oral_arguments	23 ZF Automotives US, Inc. V. Luxshare, Ltd. (21-401) oral_arguments	24 today_at_the_court On Thursday, the court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term starting at 10 a.m. Opinions opinions	25 Conference private_conferences	26
27	28 Orders orders Ledure v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (20-807) oral_arguments Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon (21-309) oral_arguments	29 Ledure v. Union Pacific Railroad Co. (20-807) oral_arguments Torres v. Texas Dept. of Public Safety (20-603) oral_arguments	30 Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana (20-1573) oral_arguments	31 Opinions opinions

April 2022

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
					1	2
3	4 Orders orders Opinions opinions	5	6	7	8	9
10	11	12	13	14 Conference private_conferences	15	16
17	18 Orders orders United States v. Washington (21-404) oral_arguments Siegel v. Fitzgerald (21-441) oral_arguments	19 George v. McDonough (21-234) oral_arguments Kemp v. United States (21-5726) oral_arguments	20 Vega v. Tech (21-499) oral_arguments	21 Opinions opinions	22 Conference private_conferences	23
24	25 Orders orders Kennedy v. Bremerton School Dept. (21-418) oral_arguments Nance v. Ward (21-439) oral_arguments	26 Biden v. Texas (21-954) oral_arguments Shoop v. Twyford (21-511) oral_arguments	27 Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta (21-429) oral_arguments	28 Opinions opinions	29 Conference private_conferences	30

May 2022

June 2022

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
			1	2 Conference private_conferences	3	4
5	6 Orders orders Opinions opinions	7	8 Opinions opinions	9 Conference private_conferences	10	11
12	13 Orders orders Opinions opinions	14	15 Opinions opinions	16 Conference private_conferences	17	18
19	20 Juneteenth (observed) holidays	21 Orders orders Opinions opinions	22	23 Conference private_conferences Opinions opinions	24 Opinions opinions	25
26	27 Orders orders Opinions opinions	28	29 Conference private_conferences Opinions opinions	30 Opinions opinions

July 2022

August 2022

September 2022

October 2022

November 2022

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
		1	2 Bittner v. United States (21-1195) oral_arguments	3	4 Conference private_conferences	5
6	7 Orders orders Axon Enterprise v. FTC (21-86) oral_arguments SEC v. Cochran (21-1239) oral_arguments	8 Mallory v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co. (21-1168) oral_arguments Health and Hospital Corp. v. Talevski (21-806) oral_arguments	9 Haaland v. Brackeen (21-376) oral_arguments	10 Conference private_conferences	11 Veterans Day holidays	12
13	14 Orders orders	15	16	17	18 Conference private_conferences	19
20	21 Orders orders	22	23	24 Thanksgiving Day holidays	25	26
27	28 Percoco v. United States (21-1158) oral_arguments Ciminelli v. United States (21-1170) oral_arguments	29 United States v. Texas (22-58) oral_arguments	30 Wilkins v. United States (21-1164) oral_arguments

December 2022

January 2023

Su	Mo	Tu	We	Th	Fr	Sa
1	2 New Year's Day (observed) holidays	3	4	5	6 Conference private_conferences	7
8	9 In re Grand Jury (21-1397) oral_arguments The Ohio Adjutant General’s Department v. Federal Labor Relations Authority (21-1454) oral_arguments Orders orders	10 Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters (21-1449) oral_arguments	11 Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo, Inc. (22-96) oral_arguments	12	13 Conference private_conferences	14
15	16 Martin Luther King Jr. Day holidays	17 Santos-Zacaria v. Garland (21-1436) oral_arguments Turkiye Halk Bankasi A.S. v. United States (21-1450) oral_arguments Orders orders	18 Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools (21-887) oral_arguments	19	20 Conference private_conferences	21
22	23 Orders orders Opinions opinions	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31

February 2023

March 2023

April 2023

May 2023

7
Conference
private_conferences
National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (21A244)
oral_arguments
Biden v. Missouri (21A240)
oral_arguments

10
Orders
orders
Gallardo v. Marstiller (20-1263)
oral_arguments

11
Johnson v. Arteaga-Martinez (19-896)
oral_arguments
Garland v. Gonzalez (20-322)
oral_arguments

12
Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (20-1472)
oral_arguments

13
today_at_the_court
On Thursday, the court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term starting at 10 a.m.

Opinions
opinions

14
Conference
private_conferences

17
Martin Luther King, Jr. Day
holidays

18
Orders
orders
Shurtleff v. Boston (20-1800)
oral_arguments
Cassirer v. Thyssen-Bornemisza Collection Foundation (20-1566)
oral_arguments

19
Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate (21-12)
oral_arguments
Concepcion v. United States (20-1650)
oral_arguments

20
today_at_the_court
On Thursday, the court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term starting at 10 a.m.

Opinions
opinions

21
Conference
private_conferences

24
today_at_the_court
On Monday, the court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term starting at 10 a.m.

Orders
orders
Opinions
opinions