Skip to content
SCOTUS NEWS

Supreme Court declines to hear gun-control challenges

By Amy Howe on June 2, 2025

The Supreme Court refused to take up challenges to gun-control laws in Maryland and Rhode Island. Three justices suggested they would have granted review of the cases, leaving the challengers one vote short of the four votes necessary for the court to hear oral arguments and weigh in on the merits of their case.

The Supreme Court

The justices issued orders on Monday, June 2. (Anthony Quintano via Flickr)

SCOTUS OUTSIDE OPINIONS

The Supreme Court should livestream opinion announcements

By Kit Beyer on June 3 at 11:26 am

The Supreme Court has livestreamed oral arguments since 2020, allowing the public to listen to the justices’ questions in real time. But when the court reads its decisions from the bench, live audio remains unavailable until the court’s next term. Kit Beyer contends that such a practice needlessly limits timely public access to major opinion announcements and hampers judicial transparency.

SCOTUS NEWS

Supreme Court adds four cases to next term’s docket 

By Amy Howe on June 2 at 1:46 pm

On Monday, June 2, the Supreme Court agreed to hear four new cases. The issues in the cases range widely, from vote counting to the ability of police officers to enter one’s home without a warrant.  The cases are slated to be heard in the court’s 2025-26 term.

EMERGENCY DOCKET

Trump administration again comes to the Supreme Court seeking large-scale reductions in the federal workforce 

By Amy Howe on June 2 at 2:50 pm

The Trump administration is seeking to pause a district court’s order preventing the government from instituting large-scale reductions in the federal workforce. Solicitor General D. John Sauer contends that the district court’s order imposes “ongoing and severe harm on the government” and interferes with the executive branch’s legal authority.

Advocates in Conversation

2024-Jan-Snow-Banner-4B-scaled
San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu discusses City and County of San Francisco v. EPA, in which the court is considering whether the Environmental Protection Agency violates the Clean Water Act when it imposes generic prohibitions in a permit for a city’s water discharges, without specifying explicit standards for discharges.   
Read More

More news

WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Tuesday, June 3

By Zachary Shemtob on June 3, 2025

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Tuesday morning read:

Coming up: On Thursday, June 5, the court expects to issue one or more opinions from the current term. We’ll be live at 9:30 a.m. EDT that day for the opinion(s).

WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Monday, June 2

By Zachary Shemtob on June 2, 2025

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Monday morning read:

Coming up: On Thursday, June 5, the court expects to issue one or more opinions from the current term. We’ll be live at 9:30 a.m. EDT that day for the opinion(s).

OPINION ANALYSIS

Supreme Court limits scope of environmental review 

By Amy Howe on May 30, 2025

The Supreme Court on Thursday unanimously ruled to limit the scope of environmental review required under a seminal 1970s environmental protection law. The move brought a proposed 88-mile railroad line that would transport crude oil from oilfields in northern Utah to refineries on the Gulf Coast one step closer to production. Environmental groups and a neighboring Colorado county had told the justices that the federal agency that approved the project had failed to consider its broader environmental costs. 

Continue Reading
WHAT WE’RE READING

The morning read for Friday, May 30

By Zachary Shemtob on May 30, 2025

Yesterday, May 29, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Seven County Infrastructure Coalition v. Eagle County.

Each weekday, we select a short list of news articles and commentary related to the Supreme Court. Here’s the Thursday morning read:

RELIST WATCH

Government contractors’ defenses, election challenges, and intellectual disability in capital cases

By John Elwood on May 29, 2025

The Relist Watch column examines cert petitions that the Supreme Court has “relisted” for its upcoming conference. A short explanation of relists is available here.

The Supreme Court is making good progress in sorting through the current relists. This week it disposed of four. It was good news for the petitioner in Fernandez v. United States, involving the scope of a statute that gives judges discretion to reduce criminal sentences for “extraordinary and compelling reasons.” The court will consider whether those “extraordinary and compelling reasons” include doubt about guilt that may also be alleged as grounds for vacatur of a sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The court is now holding a second relisted petition raising a similar issue, Elliott v. United States, pending disposition in Fernandez.

Continue Reading