Statistics

Statistics

Argument preview: Justices to hear oral argument on additional time for sex offenders who violate terms of supervised release – Amy Howe

Argument analysis: Meandering argument suggests justices likely to narrow bankrupts’ power to rescind licenses in bankruptcy – Ronald Mann

Opinion analysis: A win for one taxpayer, but not many more – Daniel Hemel

Dispositions by sitting (major cases in red, decided cases shaded gray, reargued cases struck through)

Majority opinions authored by sitting

Pace of grants

Pace of decisions

Circuits

Voting relationships – OT2017

Dispositions by sitting (major cases in red, decided cases shaded gray, reargued cases struck through)

Majority opinions authored by sitting

Pace of grants

Pace of decisions

Circuits

Voting relationships – OT2017

Feb. 2019

Featured Posts

Email Digest Sign-Up

Merits Case Pages and Archives

Major Cases

Recent Decisions

Current Relists

Recent Special Features

Live Blog Archives

Feb. 2019

Download our App in the Apple Store

First Mondays see all

Videos see all

Peabody Award

Sigma Delta Chi

National Press Club Award

Silver Gavel Award

American Gavel Award

Webby Award

Conference of February 15, 2019

On this page, we keep ongoing statistics for the October 2018 term – dispositions by sitting, majority opinions authored by sitting, pace of grants, pace of decisions, the circuit scorecard and justice agreement. Our most recent complete Stat Pack, which includes these and other variables for the October 2017 term, can be found here (published June 29, 2018). Previous editions of the Stat Pack can be found at the Stat Pack archive. We regularly cross-post statistical analysis related to the court from Empirical SCOTUS.

October (9)	November (12)	December (10)	January (11)	February (6)	March (9)	April (13)	Unscheduled (1)
Weyerhaeuser	Schein	Apple	Merck	Return Mail	Bethune	Brunetti	Gray
Mt. Lemmon	Lamps Plus	Nieves	Obduskey	Mission Prd.	Smith	Emulex
Gundy	Cougar Den	Nutraceutical	Herrera	Manhattan	Cochise	Parker
Madison	Garza	Murphy	Fourth Est.	Haymond	Flowers	Kaestner Tr.
~~Knick~~	Frank	Timbs	Hyatt	Mont	PDR	Davis
New Prime	Jam	Dawson	Thacker	Am. Legion	Dutra	McDonough
Stokeling	Sturgeon	Lorenzo	Rimini		Rucho	Food Mrkt.
Stitt	Va. Uranium	Biestek	Home Dpt.		Benisek	Fort Bend
Preap	Bucklew	Helsinn	Allina		Kisor	Mitchell
Air & Liquid	BNSF Railway	Gamble	Knick			Rehaif
	Harrison		Tenn. Wine			Quarles
	Culbertson					Taggart
						Commerce


	Oct.	Nov.	Dec.	Jan.	Feb.	March	April	Total
Argued	10	12	10	11	2	0	0	45

Roberts	1							1
Thomas	1	1	1					3
Ginsburg	1		1					2
Breyer	1							1
Alito								0
Sotomayor								0
Kagan								0
Gorsuch	1		1					2
Kavanaugh		1						1
Per Cur.								0

Remaining	4	10	7	11	6	9	13	61
	Oct.	Nov.	Dec.	Jan.	Feb.	March	April	Total

*Click the image to get a bigger look at the court’s current pace of grants

*The Minimum Distribution Pace presented in this chart reflects the number of petitions that must be granted to fill the court’s docket for oral argument while giving the litigants in each case a complete or near-complete briefing schedule. The pace also reflects the number of petitions raised at each conference and other factors affecting the certiorari process.

*Click the image to get a bigger look at the court’s current pace of decisions

	Total	% Total	Aff’d	Rev	% Aff’d	% Rev’d
CA1	2	3%	1	0	100%	0%
CA2	5	7%
CA3	3	4%
CA4	4	5%
CA5	4	5%	0	2	0%	100%
CA6	7	9%	0	2	0%	100%
CA7	–	–
CA8	4	5%	0	1	0%	100%
CA9	14	19%	1	1	50%	50%
CA10	3	4%
CA11	7	9%	1	1	50%	50%
CADC	3	4%
CAFC	5	7%	1	0	100%	0%
CAAF	0	–
State	11	15%	0	3	0%	100%
Dist. Court	3	4%
Orig.	0	–	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Total	75	100%	4	10	28.57%	71.43%

	Justice Agreement in full, in part, or in judgment
	AMK	CT	RBG	SGB	SAA	SMS	EK	NMG
JGR	90%	79%	68%	70%	77%	66%	72%	83%
	AMK	83%	66%	66%	82%	65%	71%	86%
		CT	55%	55%	93%	51%	59%	81%
			RBG	89%	54%	96%	90%	58%
				SGB	54%	90%	93%	61%
					SAA	49%	57%	83%
						SMS	91%	55%
							EK	64%
								NMG

Featured Posts

Argument preview: Justices to hear oral argument on additional time for sex offenders who violate terms of supervised release – Amy Howe

Argument analysis: Meandering argument suggests justices likely to narrow bankrupts’ power to rescind licenses in bankruptcy – Ronald Mann

Opinion analysis: A win for one taxpayer, but not many more – Daniel Hemel
Email Digest Sign-Up
Receive a daily email digest from Feedburner by entering your email.
Merits Case Pages and Archives

Archives

or

This Week at the Court
The Supreme Court released orders from the February 15 conference on Tuesday; the justices added County of Maui, Hawaii v. Hawaii Wildlife Fund to next term's merits docket and summarily reversed in Moore v. Texas.
On Wednesday the justices released their opinions in Dawson v. Steager and Timbs v. Indiana.
On Tuesday, the justices heard oral argument in Return Mail Inc. v. United States Postal Service.
On Wednesday, the justices heard oral argument in Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC.
On Friday, the justices will meet for their February 22 conference.
Major Cases
- Lamone v. Benisek
  In case in which the plaintiffs allege that a Maryland congressional district was gerrymandered to retaliate against them for their political views: (1) whether the various legal claims articulated by the three-judge district court are unmanageable; (2) whether the three-judge district court erred when, in granting plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment, it resolved disputes of material fact as to multiple elements of plaintiffs’ claims, failed to view the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, and treated as “undisputed” evidence that is the subject of still-unresolved hearsay and other evidentiary objections; and (3) whether the three-judge district court abused its discretion in entering an injunction despite the plaintiffs’ years-long delay in seeking injunctive relief, rendering the remedy applicable to at most one election before the next decennial census necessitates another redistricting.
- Kisor v. Wilkie
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule Auer v. Robbins and Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co., which direct courts to defer to an agency’s reasonable interpretation of its own ambiguous regulation.
- Rucho v. Common Cause
  (1) Whether plaintiffs have standing to press their partisan gerrymandering claims; (2) whether plaintiffs’ partisan gerrymandering claims are justiciable; and (3) whether North Carolina’s 2016 congressional map is, in fact, an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander.
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York, New York
  Whether New York City’s ban on transporting a licensed, locked and unloaded handgun to a home or shooting range outside city limits is consistent with the Second Amendment, the commerce clause and the constitutional right to travel.
- The American Legion v. American Humanist Association
  (1) Whether a 93-year-old memorial to the fallen of World War I is unconstitutional merely because it is shaped like a cross; (2) whether the constitutionality of a passive display incorporating religious symbolism should be assessed under the tests articulated in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Van Orden v. Perry, Town of Greece v. Galloway or some other test; and (3) whether, if the test from Lemon v. Kurtzman applies, the expenditure of funds for the routine upkeep and maintenance of a cross-shaped war memorial, without more, amounts to an excessive entanglement with religion in violation of the First Amendment.
- Gamble v. United States
  Whether the Supreme Court should overrule the “separate sovereigns” exception to the double jeopardy clause.
see all this term’s cases »
Recent Decisions
- Dawson v. Steager By taxing the federal pension benefits of U.S. Marshals Service retiree James Dawson, while exempting from taxation the pension benefits of certain state and local law enforcement officers, West Virginia unlawfully discriminates against Dawson as 4 U.S.C. §111 forbids.
- Timbs v. Indiana The Eighth Amendment’s excessive fines clause is an incorporated protection applicable to the states under the 14th Amendment’s due process clause.
- Moore v. Texas The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ redetermination that Bobby James Moore does not have an intellectual disability and is thus eligible for the death penalty is inconsistent with the Supreme Court's 2017 decision in Moore v. Texas.
see all this term’s cases »
Current Relists
- Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda Whether the prohibition in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1), against employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” encompasses discrimination based on an individual’s sexual orientation.
- Baxter v. United States (1) Whether a conviction for robbery under Florida law qualifies as a “violent felony” within the Armed Career Criminal Act’s elements clause simply because it requires overcoming victim resistance, as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit has held, or whether such a conviction fails to qualify as an ACCA “violent felony” because Florida caselaw confirms that overcoming victim resistance does not invariably requires the use of “violent force” as the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit has held; and (2) whether a conviction for any state robbery offense that includes “as an element” the common law requirement of overcoming “victim resistance” is categorically a “violent felony” within the ACCA’s elements clause if the offense has been specifically interpreted by state appellate courts to require only slight force to overcome resistance.
- Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia Whether discrimination against an employee because of sexual orientation constitutes prohibited employment discrimination “because of . . . sex” within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2.
More Petitions »
Recent Special Features
Statistical Snapshot

Cases argued 45

Cases decided 13

Summary reversals 3

Merits cases granted to date 74

see all »
Live Blog Archives
See all
Twitter Feed

Tweets by @SCOTUSblog

Full Calendar Submit Event

Orders/Opinions
Arguments
Conferences

Events
Holidays
Multiple

Download our App in the Apple Store
First Mondays see all
Videos see all

Justice Sotomayor at the Library of Congress

On February 14, Justice Sonia Sotomayor appeared at the Library of Congress with Chief Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit and Professor Eloise Pasachoff of the Georgetown University Law Center for the Supreme Court Fellows Annual Lecture.

Peabody Award
Awarded the Peabody Award for excellence in electronic media.
Sigma Delta Chi
Awarded the Sigma Delta Chi deadline reporting award for online coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
National Press Club Award
Awarded the National Press Club's Breaking News Award for coverage of the Affordable Care Act decision.
Silver Gavel Award
Awarded the Silver Gavel Award by the American Bar Association for fostering the American public’s understanding of the law and the legal system.
American Gavel Award
Awarded the American Gavel Award for Distinguished Reporting About the Judiciary to recognize the highest standards of reporting about courts and the justice system.
Webby Award
Awarded the Webby Award for excellence on the internet.

	Justice Agreement in full, in part, or in judgment
	AMK	CT	RBG	SGB	SAA	SMS	EK	NMG
JGR	90%	79%	68%	70%	77%	66%	72%	83%
	AMK	83%	66%	66%	82%	65%	71%	86%
		CT	55%	55%	93%	51%	59%	81%
			RBG	89%	54%	96%	90%	58%
				SGB	54%	90%	93%	61%
					SAA	49%	57%	83%
						SMS	91%	55%
							EK	64%
								NMG

Cases argued	45
Cases decided	13
Summary reversals	3
Merits cases granted to date	74

	Justice Agreement in full, in part, or in judgment
	AMK	CT	RBG	SGB	SAA	SMS	EK	NMG
JGR	90%	79%	68%	70%	77%	66%	72%	83%
	AMK	83%	66%	66%	82%	65%	71%	86%
		CT	55%	55%	93%	51%	59%	81%
			RBG	89%	54%	96%	90%	58%
				SGB	54%	90%	93%	61%
					SAA	49%	57%	83%
						SMS	91%	55%
							EK	64%
								NMG

15
Conference

19
Orders
RETURN MAIL INC. V. U.S. POSTAL SERVICE (17-1594)

20
MISSION PRODUCT HOLDINGS INC. V. TEMPNOLOGY INC. (17-1657)
Opinions

22
Conference

25
Orders
MANHATTAN COMMUNITY ACCESS CORP. V. HALLECK (17-1702)

26
UNITED STATES V. HAYMOND (17-1672)
MONT V. UNITED STATES (17-8995)

27
THE AMERICAN LEGION V. AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION (17-1717)

	Justice Agreement in full, in part, or in judgment
	AMK	CT	RBG	SGB	SAA	SMS	EK	NMG
JGR	90%	79%	68%	70%	77%	66%	72%	83%
	AMK	83%	66%	66%	82%	65%	71%	86%
		CT	55%	55%	93%	51%	59%	81%
			RBG	89%	54%	96%	90%	58%
				SGB	54%	90%	93%	61%
					SAA	49%	57%	83%
						SMS	91%	55%
							EK	64%
								NMG