|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-5279||6th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2021|
Issue: Whether offenses that were committed as part of a single criminal spree, but sequentially in time, were “committed on occasions different from one another” for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 24 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)|
|Aug 12 2020||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Aug 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 22 2020||Response Requested. (Due October 22, 2020)|
|Oct 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2020 to November 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 15 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2020.|
|Nov 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2020 to December 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 10 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 23, 2020.|
|Dec 21 2020||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jan 06 2021||Reply of petitioner William Dale Wooden filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 07 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.|
|Feb 12 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.|
|Mar 05 2021||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Mar 22 2021||Joint motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including May 3, 2021. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including June 28, 2021.|
|May 03 2021||Brief of petitioner William Dale Wooden filed.|
|May 03 2021||Joint appendix filed.|
|May 10 2021||Amicus brief of National Association Of Criminal Defense Lawyers submitted.|
|May 10 2021||Amicus brief of Roderick & Solange MacArthur Justice Center submitted.|
|May 10 2021||Amicus brief of Human Rights For Kids submitted.|
|May 10 2021||Amicus brief of National Association of Federal Defenders submitted.|
|May 10 2021||Amicus brief of Professors of Criminal Law submitted.|
|May 10 2021||Amicus brief of FAMM submitted.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.