Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-5279 | 6th Cir. | TBD | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2021 |
Issue: Whether offenses that were committed as part of a single criminal spree, but sequentially in time, were “committed on occasions different from one another” for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jul 24 2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020) |
Aug 12 2020 | Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed. |
Aug 27 2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020. |
Sep 22 2020 | Response Requested. (Due October 22, 2020) |
Oct 14 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2020 to November 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Oct 15 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2020. |
Nov 09 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2020 to December 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
Nov 10 2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 23, 2020. |
Dec 21 2020 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Jan 06 2021 | Reply of petitioner William Dale Wooden filed. (Distributed) |
Jan 07 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021. |
Feb 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021. |
Feb 22 2021 | Motion to proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition. |
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
www.scotusblog.com
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
www.scotusblog.com
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
www.scotusblog.com
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.