|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-5279||6th Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2021|
Issue: Whether offenses that were committed as part of a single criminal spree, but sequentially in time, were “committed on occasions different from one another” for purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 24 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due September 4, 2020)|
|Aug 12 2020||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Aug 27 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Sep 22 2020||Response Requested. (Due October 22, 2020)|
|Oct 14 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 22, 2020 to November 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 15 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 23, 2020.|
|Nov 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 23, 2020 to December 23, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 10 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 23, 2020.|
|Dec 21 2020||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Jan 06 2021||Reply of petitioner William Dale Wooden filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 07 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.|
|Feb 12 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||Motion to proceed in forma pauperis GRANTED. Petition for a writ of certiorari GRANTED limited to Question 2 presented by the petition.|
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
Tomorrow morning the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a pair of voting rights cases involving Section 2 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act, which prohibits policies or laws that result in racial discrimination in voting.
Missed the morning orders? @AHoweBlogger's got you covered. Read about the new grants including a review of Puerto Rico’s eligibility for a federal benefits program. Plus, she's got an overview of several high-profile petitions still under consideration.
Court will review Puerto Rico’s eligibility for federal benefits program - SCOTUSblog
The court on Monday morning issued orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Feb. 26. The justic...
NEW: SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases. Here's the orders list. https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/030121zor_m6hn.pdf
#SCOTUS grants US v. Vaello-Madero, a challenge to exclusion of Puerto Rico residents from eligibility for Supplemental Social Security Income program, which provides benefits to poor disabled adults & children