Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

On Friday, the Supreme Court released orders from the January 17 conference, granting six cases for a total of three hours of oral argument. The justices are expected to release additional orders from the conference on Tuesday at 9:30 a.m.
On Tuesday at 10:00 a.m., the justices will hear oral argument in Shular v. United States. Click to read our preview from Leah Litman.
On Tuesday at 11:00 a.m., the justices will hear oral argument in GE Energy Power Conversion France v. Outokumpu Stainless USA. Click to read our preview from Ronald Mann.

Miriam Seifter Guest

Miriam Seifter is an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School, where she teaches courses in Administrative Law, Energy Law, and Property Law. Her scholarly interests include administrative law, environmental and energy law, and federalism. Her recent work focuses on the role of states and interest groups in the federal regulatory process.

Professor Seifter received a B.A. magna cum laude from Yale University, an M.Sc. with distinction from Oxford University, and a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she was the Environmental Fellow and an Articles Editor on the Harvard Law Review. After law school, she served as a law clerk for Chief Judge Merrick Garland on the D.C. Circuit and for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the Supreme Court of the United States. Prior to joining the UW Law faculty, she was a Visiting Researcher and Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center and worked in private practice at Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP in San Francisco.

Date Post Title
« Previous PageNext Page »
10.05.17 Argument preview: Justices to determine how Clean Water Act litigation flows
06.23.17 Opinion analysis: In regulatory takings case, court announces a new test
03.21.17 Argument analysis: Justices search for a common denominator in takings case
03.14.17 Argument preview: Defining the denominator in regulatory takings law
06.01.16 Opinion analysis: Narrow loss for the government in Clean Water Act finality case
03.31.16 Argument analysis: Justices debate finality issues in Clean Water Act case
03.24.16 Argument preview: Diving into finality issues under the Clean Water Act
01.16.15 Opinion analysis: Reason-giving, federalism, and a partial win for cell towers
11.11.14 Argument analysis: A narrow dispute about reason-giving
11.07.14 Argument preview: Local governments and reason-giving
Term Snapshot
At a Glance