Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

On Monday at 9:30 a.m., the court is expected to release orders from the February 21 conference. At 10:00 a.m., the justices will hear oral argument in U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association. Click to read our preview from Noah Sachs.
On Monday at 11:00 a.m., the justices will hear oral argument in Opati v. Sudan. Click to read our preview from Amy Howe.
On Tuesday and Wednesday, there is a possibility of opinions at 10:00 a.m.

Miriam Seifter Guest

Miriam Seifter is an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School, where she teaches courses in Administrative Law, Energy Law, and Property Law. Her scholarly interests include administrative law, environmental and energy law, and federalism. Her recent work focuses on the role of states and interest groups in the federal regulatory process.

Professor Seifter received a B.A. magna cum laude from Yale University, an M.Sc. with distinction from Oxford University, and a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she was the Environmental Fellow and an Articles Editor on the Harvard Law Review. After law school, she served as a law clerk for Chief Judge Merrick Garland on the D.C. Circuit and for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the Supreme Court of the United States. Prior to joining the UW Law faculty, she was a Visiting Researcher and Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center and worked in private practice at Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP in San Francisco.

Date Post Title
Next Page »
06.22.19 Opinion analysis: Court overrules takings precedent, allowing more suits in federal court
01.17.19 Reargument analysis: Justices seek a “middle position” in takings litigation case
01.09.19 Reargument preview: A new theory of when local-government takings occur
10.04.18 Argument analysis: Weighing federal court access for local takings plaintiffs
09.26.18 Argument preview: Overruling Williamson County in the “Knick” of time?
06.12.18 Opinion analysis: Court affirms without opinion in tribal-fishing-rights case
04.19.18 Argument analysis: Court debates standard for violating tribal fishing rights
04.11.18 Argument preview: Justices to consider the scope of tribal fishing rights
01.22.18 Opinion analysis: Challenges to the WOTUS rule must begin in district court
10.12.17 Argument analysis: Wading through the “themeless pudding” of Clean Water Act jurisdiction
Term Snapshot
At a Glance