Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Holding
As applied to closely held corporations, the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to provide their female employees with no-cost access to contraception violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Judgment
Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Samuel Alito on Jun 30, 2014. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined, and which Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan joined to all but Part III-C-1. Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion.
Issue: Whether the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 (RFRA), 42 U.S.C. §” 2000bb et seq., which provides that the government “shall not substantially burden a person”s exercise of religion” unless that burden is the least restrictive means to further a compelling governmental interest, allows a for-profit corporation to deny its employees the health coverage of contraceptives to which the employees are otherwise entitled by federal law, based on the religious objections of the corporation”s owners.
Recommended Citation: Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/sebelius-v-hobby-lobby-stores-inc/