Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell
Holding
As applied to closely held corporations, the regulations promulgated by the Department of Health and Human Services requiring employers to provide their female employees with no-cost access to contraception violate the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
Judgment
Affirmed, 5-4, in an opinion by Samuel Alito on Jun 30, 1914. Justice Ginsburg filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Sotomayor joined, and which Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan joined to all but Part III-C-1. Justice Breyer and Justice Kagan filed a dissenting opinion.
Issue: Whether the religious owners of a family business, or their closely held, for-profit corporation, have free exercise rights that are violated by the application of the contraceptive-coverage mandate of the Affordable Care Act.
Recommended Citation: Conestoga Wood Specialties Corp. v. Burwell, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/conestoga-wood-specialties-corp-v-sebelius/