National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning
Holding
The Recess Appointments Clause authorizes the president to fill any existing vacancy during any recess " whether occurring during or between sessions of Congress " of sufficient length. However, for purposes of the clause, the Senate is in session whenever it indicates that it is, as long as " under its own rules " it retains the capacity to transact Senate business.
Judgment
Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Stephen G. Breyer on Jun 26, 2014. Justice Scalia filed an opinion concurring in the judgment, which Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito joined.
Issue: (1) Whether the President”s recess-appointment power may be exercised during a recess that occurs within a session of the Senate, or is instead limited to recesses that occur between enumerated sessions of the Senate; (2) whether the President”s recess-appointment power may be exercised to fill vacancies that exist during a recess, or is instead limited to vacancies that first arose during that recess; and (3) whether the President’s recess-appointment power may be exercised when the Senate is convening every three days in pro forma sessions.
Recommended Citation: National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, SCOTUSblog, https://www.scotusblog.com/cases/national-labor-relations-board-v-noel-canning/