United States v. Supreme Court of New Mexico
Petition for certiorari denied on October 2, 2017
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit erred in holding that New Mexico Rule of Professional Conduct 16-308(E)"which states that a prosecutor shall not "subpoena a lawyer in a grand jury or other criminal proceeding to present evidence about a past or present clients unless the prosecutor reasonably believes," among other things, that "the evidence sought is essential to the successful completion of an ongoing investigation or prosecution" and that "there is no other feasible alternative to obtain the information""may be applied to federal prosecutors serving subpoenas outside the grand jury context.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the day (Aurora Barnes, July 18, 2017)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
06/05/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 6, 2017) |
06/29/2017 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including August 7, 2017. |
08/07/2017 | Response to petition from respondents Supreme Court of New Mexico, et al. filed. |
08/23/2017 | Reply of petitioner United States filed. |
08/30/2017 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/25/2017. |
10/02/2017 | Petition DENIED. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. |