Maricopa County, Arizona v. Villa
Petition for certiorari denied on April 30, 2018
Issue: Whether Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, which states that "the principal prosecuting attorney" of a state or locality may apply for an order authorizing the interception of wire, oral, or electronic communications, 18 U.S.C. § 2516(2), allows a principal prosecuting attorney to delegate the task of applying for such an order to a subordinate.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petition of the day (Aurora Barnes, January 17, 2018)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 12/13/2017 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 16, 2018) |
| 01/08/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 16, 2018 to February 14, 2018, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 01/10/2018 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 14, 2018. |
| 01/16/2018 | Brief amici curiae of Arizona Voice for Crime Victims, Inc. and the Association of Deputy District Attorneys filed. |
| 02/13/2018 | Waiver of right of respondent Manuela Villa to respond filed. |
| 02/21/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/16/2018. |
| 02/26/2018 | Response Requested. (Due March 28, 2018) |
| 03/27/2018 | Brief of respondent Manuela Villa in opposition filed. |
| 04/09/2018 | Reply of petitioners Maricopa County, et al. filed. |
| 04/11/2018 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018. |
| 04/30/2018 | Petition DENIED. |