Skip to content

Conagra Brands, Inc. v. Brise”o

Petition for certiorari denied on October 10, 2017

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
16-1221 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2017

Issue: Whether Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 permits a district court to certify a damages class where there is no reliable, administratively feasible method of identifying the members of the class.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
04/10/2017Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 12, 2017)
04/18/2017Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 16, 2017.
04/27/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioner.
05/01/2017Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or neither party, received from counsel for respondents.
05/12/2017Brief amici curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, et al. filed.
05/12/2017Brief amicus curiae of Washington Legal Foundation filed.
05/12/2017Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers filed.
05/12/2017Brief amicus curiae of The Grocery Manufacturers Association filed.
06/16/2017Brief of respondents Robert Briseno, et al. in opposition filed.
07/05/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 25, 2017.
07/05/2017Reply of petitioner Conagra Brands, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
07/11/2017Supplemental brief of respondents Robert Briseno, et al. filed. (Distributed)
07/13/2017Supplemental brief of petitioner Conagra Brands, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
08/18/2017Second supplemental brief of respondents Robert Briseno, et al. filed. (Distributed)
08/18/2017Second supplemental brief of petitioner Conagra Brands, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
09/21/2017Rescheduled.
10/02/2017DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/6/2017.
10/10/2017Petition DENIED.