|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo and Alabama-Coushatta Indian Tribes of Texas Restoration Act provides the Ysleta del Sur Pueblo with sovereign authority to regulate non-prohibited gaming activities on its lands (including bingo), as set forth in the plain language of Section 107(b), the act’s legislative history and the Supreme Court’s holding in California v. Cabazon Band of Mission Indians, or whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit’s decision affirming Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Texas (Ysleta I) correctly subjects the pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 09 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)|
|Oct 26 2020||Waiver of right of respondent State of Texas to respond filed.|
|Oct 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/13/2020.|
|Nov 03 2020||Brief amici curiae of Alabama-Coushatta Tribe of Texas, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 10 2020||Response Requested. (Due December 10, 2020)|
|Nov 12 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 10, 2020 to January 11, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 11, 2021.|
|Jan 11 2021||Brief of respondent State of Texas in opposition filed.|
|Jan 25 2021||Reply of petitioners Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, The Tribal Council, The Tribal Governor Michael Silvas or his Successor filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 27 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 22 2021||The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
Opinions Monday! 🗓
#SCOTUS will release orders from today's conference on Monday morning at 9:30 am, followed by opinion(s) in argued cases at 10 am, according to the Court's website.
NEW: After a request from the Biden administration yesterday, the Supreme Court just dismissed three pending cert petitions (requests to hear a case) about the Trump administration’s effort to withhold money from so-called sanctuary cities.
🚨 LIVE NOW 🚨 5PM on IGTV #SimplePolitics join me & @AHoweBlogger editor / reporter for the @SCOTUSblog for a great conversation on the recent decisions by the Supreme Court. There is so much to talk about.
SimplePolitics with Kim Wehle - Special Guest Bill Kristol, Editor-At-Large, The Bulwark
Tonight on #SimplePolitics, Bill Kristol and I have an in-depth conversation about Impeachment, what‘s next for ...
ICYMI: We got Justice Amy Coney Barrett’s first majority opinion today.
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.