Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

We're currently hosting a symposium on Tuesday's decision in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Click to follow along.
We also hosted a symposium on Monday's decision in June Medical Services v. Russo. Click to read the submissions.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

On Thursday, the court released orders from the July 1 conference. The justices granted five cases for a total of four hours of oral argument next term.
On Monday, we expect the court to release opinions at 10 a.m. We will be live-blogging starting at 9:20 a.m. at this link, where you can sign up for an email reminder when the live blog begins.

Walker v. Martin

Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
09-996 9th Cir. Nov 29, 2010
Tr.Aud.
Feb 23, 2011 9-0 Ginsburg OT 2010

Holding: A California rule requiring state habeas petitions to be filed as promptly as the circumstances allow constitutes an independent state ground that is adequate to bar habeas relief in federal court.

Plain English Holding: A California rule requiring state habeas petitions to be filed “as promptly as the circumstances allow” constitutes an independent state ground that is adequate to bar habeas relief in federal court.

Judgment: Reversed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg on February 23, 2011.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

Briefs and Documents

Merits Briefs

Amicus Briefs

Certiorari-Stage Documents

  • Opinion below (9th Circuit, unpublished)
  • Petition for certiorari (unavailable)
  • Brief in opposition
  • Petitioner’s reply (unavailable)
  • Amicus brief of the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation (unavailable)
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards