Linked with:
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12-1152 | D.C. Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2013 |
Issue: (1) Whether Virginia and other petitioners below demonstrated that there was evidence of central relevance to the EPA’s Endangerment Finding not available during the comment period such that the Administrator was obligated to convene a proceeding for reconsideration with procedural rights of notice and comment; (2) whether the EPA correctly applied the standard for demonstrating central relevance; (3) whether the EPA erred when it found the objections material enough to require resort to extensive new evidence outside of the record while denying the rights of notice and comment on that evidence; and (4) whether the EPA erred initially and on Petition for Reconsideration by delegating its Statutory Authority to outside entities.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Mar 20 2013 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2013) |
Apr 11 2013 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 22, 2013, for all respondents. |
May 8 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for Texas, and eight other states. |
May 13 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for petitioners Southeastern Legal Foundation, Inc., et al. |
May 14 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicius curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the Federal Respondent. |
May 14 2013 | Letter of respondent National Environmental Development Association's Clean Air Project in support of the petition received. |
May 15 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including June 21, 2013, for all respondents. |
May 17 2013 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the State of Indiana. |
Jun 6 2013 | Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including July 22, 2013, for all respondents. . |
Jun 7 2013 | Application (12A1181) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Jun 7 2013 | Application (12A1181) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits granted by The Chief Justice. The consolidated brief in opposition may not exceed 12,000 words. |
Jul 1 2013 | Application (13A35) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits, submitted to The Chief Justice. |
Jul 8 2013 | Application (13A35) to file consolidated brief in opposition in excess of word limits granted by The Chief Justice. The consolidated brief in opposition may not exceed 11,000 words. |
Jul 22 2013 | Brief of respondents Environmental Protection Agency in opposition filed. VIDED. |
Jul 22 2013 | Brief of Environmental Organization respondents in opposition filed. VIDED. |
Jul 22 2013 | Brief of respondents New York, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED. |
Aug 5 2013 | Reply of petitioners Virginia, et al. filed. |
Aug 7 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 30, 2013. |
Oct 7 2013 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 11, 2013. |
Oct 15 2013 | Petition DENIED. |
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/