|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|15-423||D.C. Cir.||Nov 2, 2016||May 1, 2017||8-0||Breyer||OT 2016|
Holding: A case falls within the scope of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act’s expropriation exception only if the property in which a party claims to hold rights was indeed "property taken in violation of international law"; simply making a nonfrivolous argument to that effect is not sufficient; a court should resolve any factual disputes about a foreign sovereign's immunity defense as near to the outset of the case as is reasonably possible.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Breyer on May 1, 2017. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 5 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2015)|
|Oct 27 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including December 7, 2015.|
|Dec 3 2015||Order further extending time to file response to petition to and including January 6, 2016.|
|Jan 6 2016||Brief of respondents Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jan 19 2016||Reply of petitioners Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, et al. filed.|
|Jan 20 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 19, 2016.|
|Feb 29 2016||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 24 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 6 2016||Supplemental brief of respondents Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., et al. filed.|
|Jun 7 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 27 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016.|
|Jun 28 2016||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 3 presented by the petition.|
|Jul 21 2016||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Jul 28 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 19, 2016.|
|Jul 29 2016||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 26, 2016.|
|Aug 19 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 19 2016||Brief of petitioners Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, et al. filed.|
|Aug 26 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Sep 2 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Wednesday, November 2, 2016|
|Sep 9 2016||Record has been requested from the U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit.|
|Sep 23 2016||Record received from U.S.C.A. District of Columbia Circuit. The record is electronic and located on PACER, with the exception of an electronic copy of the transcript of the oral argument.|
|Sep 23 2016||Record received from the U.S.D.C. District of Columbia is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Sep 26 2016||Brief of respondents Helmerich & Payne International Drilling Co., et al. filed.|
|Sep 28 2016||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 29 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 3 2016||Brief amici curiae of Former State Department Attorneys John Norton Moore and Edwin D. Williamson filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 17 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 21 2016||Reply of petitioners Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 2 2016||Argued. For petitioners: Catherine E. Stetson, Washington, D. C.; and Elaine J. Goldenberg, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Catherine M.A. Carroll, Washington, D. C.|
|May 1 2017||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Breyer, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which all other Members joined, except Gorsuch, J., who took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.|
|Jun 2 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.