|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-678||C.D. Cal.||Not Argued||Jan 22, 2019||TBD||TBD||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the district court erred in preliminarily enjoining the military from implementing nationwide the 2018 policy of Secretary of Defense James Mattis under which transgender individuals would be permitted to serve in the military, while individuals with a history of a medical condition called gender dysphoria would be disqualified from military service unless they meet certain conditions.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 23 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 24, 2018)|
|Dec 13 2018||Response to application (18A627) requested by Justice Kagan, due Friday, December 28, 2018, by noon ET.|
|Dec 13 2018||Application (18A627) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Dec 19 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund filed. VIDED.|
|Dec 21 2018||Letter of respondent State of California filed.|
|Dec 24 2018||Brief of respondents Aiden Stockman, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Dec 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Dec 28 2018||Response to application from respondents Aiden Stockman, et al. filed.|
|Jan 04 2019||Reply of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jan 04 2019||Letter of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Jan 04 2019||Reply of applicant Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.|
|Jan 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/18/2019.|
|Jan 22 2019||Petition DENIED.|
|Jan 22 2019||Application (18A627) referred to the Court.|
|Jan 22 2019||Application (18A627) granted by the Court. The application for stay presented to Justice Kagan and by her referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s December 22, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment. Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan would deny the application.|
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.