|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether Congress has the power to authorize suits against nonconsenting states pursuant to its constitutional war powers. CVSG: 11/09/2021
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 02 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 7, 2020)|
|Nov 03 2020||Waiver of right of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety to respond filed.|
|Nov 17 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/4/2020.|
|Nov 24 2020||Response Requested. (Due December 28, 2020)|
|Dec 01 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2020 to January 27, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 02 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 27, 2021.|
|Dec 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Professor Jeffrey M. Hirsch filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Reserve Organization of America filed.|
|Dec 23 2020||Brief amici curiae of Philip C. Bobbitt, Michael C. Dorf, and H. Jefferson Powell filed.|
|Jan 27 2021||Brief of respondent Texas Department of Public Safety in opposition filed.|
|Feb 10 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/26/2021.|
|Feb 10 2021||Reply of petitioner Le Roy Torres filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 01 2021||The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Nov 09 2021||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Nov 23 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.|
|Nov 23 2021||Supplemental Brief of Le Roy Torres submitted.|
In advance of tomorrow's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, we asked experts and advocates on both sides of the abortion debate to weigh in on how the court should approach the case. You can read our full symposium here:
Symposium before oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization - SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...