|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether it violates the First Amendment to designate a labor union to represent and speak for public-sector employees who object to its advocacy on their behalf; and (2) whether Minnesota State Board for Community Colleges v. Knight, which upheld a Minnesota restriction on participation in "meet and confer" sessions to the faculty’s exclusive representative, should be overruled.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 22 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 1, 2021)|
|Feb 09 2021||Waiver of Marietta Education Association, et al. of right to respond not accepted for filing. (February 09, 2021)|
|Feb 09 2021||Waiver of right of respondent Marietta City School District Board of Education to respond filed.|
|Feb 09 2021||Waiver of right of respondent Marietta Education Association to respond filed.|
|Feb 15 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Liberty Justice Center filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 16 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Goldwater Institute filed.|
|Feb 17 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/5/2021.|
|Feb 23 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Pacific Legal Foundation filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 25 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Feb 25 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Competitive Enterprise Institute filed.|
|Feb 25 2021||Brief amicus curiae of National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation filed.|
|Feb 27 2021||Brief amici curiae of Public Policy Research Organizations and Advocacy Groups filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Response Requested. (Due March 31, 2021)|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Fairness Center filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Freedom Foundation filed.|
|Mar 08 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2021 to April 30, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 09 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 30, 2021, for all respondents.|
In yet another Friday night shadow docket order, a divided Supreme Court sides with challengers to California’s COVID-related restrictions. Brief per curiam opinion and dissent from Justice Kagan: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
By vote of 5-4, #SCOTUS blocks California's COVID-related restrictions on in-home prayer meetings and worship. Opinion & Kagan's dissent are here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/20a151_4g15.pdf
President Biden will sign an executive order authorizing a commission to study Supreme Court reform. The commission will review “the length of service and turnover of justices on the court; the membership and size of the court” among other topics.
President Biden to Sign Executive Order Creating the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States | The White House
President Biden will today issue an executive order forming the Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court of the United States, comprised of a
The Supreme Court will hear April and May oral arguments remotely but with a live audio feed.
#SCOTUS confirms that "[i]n keeping with public health guidance in response to COVID-19," it will hear oral arguments in April and on May 4 remotely, as it has for the other argument sessions this term. Press release here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/Media-Advisory-Teleconference-Arguments.pdf
In a Monday evening shadow-docket filing, Tennessee asks the Supreme Court to reinstate a state law that imposes a 48-hour waiting period for patients to abortions. A federal judge struck down the waiting period as unconstitutional. @AHoweBlogger explains:
Tennessee asks court to restore waiting period for abortions - SCOTUSblog
Tennessee filed an emergency request with the Supreme Court on Monday, asking the justices for permission to enforce...
BREAKING: In major copyright battle between tech giants, SCOTUS sides w/ Google over Oracle, finding that Google didnt commit copyright infringement when it reused lines of code in its Android operating system. The code came from Oracle's JAVA SE platform. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/18-956_d18f.pdf
NEW: The Supreme Court agrees to take up one new case, Brown v. Davenport. It's a technical but important question about the standard for federal courts reviewing habeas claims to assess whether constitutional violations were "harmless error." https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/040521zor_3204.pdf
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.