|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1269||10th Cir.||Dec 3, 2019||Feb 25, 2020||9-0||Gorsuch||OT 2019|
Holding: The rule of In re Bob Richards Chrysler-Plymouth Corp., which specifies how federal tax refund proceeds should be allocated among members of an affiliated group of corporations that file a consolidated return, is not a legitimate exercise of federal common lawmaking.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Gorsuch on February 25, 2020.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Apr 01 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2019)|
|Apr 26 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 3, 2019 to June 6, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 26 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 6, 2019.|
|Apr 26 2019||Response of Simon E. Rodriguez, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of United Western Bancorp, Inc. to motion not accepted for filing. (May 13, 2019 - paper version not received)|
|May 03 2019||Brief amicus curiae of American College of Tax Counsel filed.|
|May 29 2019||Letter from counsel for petitioner waiving the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Jun 03 2019||Brief of respondent Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for United Western Bank in opposition filed.|
|Jun 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 06 2019||Reply of petitioner Simon E. Rodriguez, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of United Western Bancorp, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.|
|Jun 28 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 09 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 16 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 30, 2019. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 17, 2019.|
|Aug 30 2019||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 30 2019||Brief of petitioner Simon E. Rodriguez, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of United Western Bancorp, Inc. filed.|
|Sep 13 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 3, 2019.|
|Oct 17 2019||Brief of respondent Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for United Western Bank filed.|
|Oct 23 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 10th Circuit...|
|Oct 25 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 14 2019||Reply of petitioner Simon E. Rodriguez, as Chapter 7 Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of United Western Bancorp, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 03 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Mitchell P. Reich, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Michael Huston, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Washington, D. C.|
|Feb 25 2020||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Gorsuch, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Mar 30 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.