|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-938||6th Cir.||Nov 13, 2019||Jan 14, 2020||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2019|
Holding: A bankruptcy court’s order unreservedly denying relief from the automatic stay constitutes a final, immediately appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2020.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 14 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)|
|Mar 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.|
|Mar 13 2019||Response Requested. (Due April 12, 2019)|
|Apr 12 2019||Brief of respondent Jackson Masonry, LLC in opposition filed.|
|Apr 17 2019||Reply of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 18 2019||Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed.|
|Apr 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 20 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 09 2019||Motion of petitioner for an extension of time filed.|
|Jun 26 2019||Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2019.|
|Jul 08 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 13, 2019.|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (Corrected brief submitted).|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (October 4, 2019). (Distributed)|
|Aug 05 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|Aug 23 2019||Motion for an extension of time to file respondents' brief on the merits filed.|
|Aug 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including October 4, 2019.|
|Sep 03 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 16 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Sep 18 2019||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.|
|Oct 04 2019||Brief of respondent Jackson Masonry, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 11 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 11 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 11 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 21 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 21 2019||Proposal of respondent to lodge copies of documents in related cases cited in respondent's brief on the merits filed.|
|Nov 04 2019||Reply of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 13 2019||Argued. For petitioner: James K. Lehman, Columbia, S. C. For respondent: Griffin S. Dunham, Nashville, Tenn.; and Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jan 14 2020||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 18 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.