|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-938||6th Cir.||Nov 13, 2019||Jan 14, 2020||9-0||Ginsburg||OT 2019|
Holding: A bankruptcy court’s order unreservedly denying relief from the automatic stay constitutes a final, immediately appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 158(a).
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Ginsburg on January 14, 2020.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 14 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 19, 2019)|
|Mar 06 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/22/2019.|
|Mar 13 2019||Response Requested. (Due April 12, 2019)|
|Apr 12 2019||Brief of respondent Jackson Masonry, LLC in opposition filed.|
|Apr 17 2019||Reply of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed.|
|Apr 18 2019||Rule 29.6 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed.|
|Apr 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/9/2019.|
|May 13 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/16/2019.|
|May 20 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 09 2019||Motion of petitioner for an extension of time filed.|
|Jun 26 2019||Motion to extend the time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including August 5, 2019.|
|Jul 08 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, November 13, 2019.|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (Corrected brief submitted).|
|Aug 05 2019||Brief of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (October 4, 2019). (Distributed)|
|Aug 05 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|Aug 23 2019||Motion for an extension of time to file respondents' brief on the merits filed.|
|Aug 29 2019||Motion to extend the time to file respondent's brief on the merits granted and the time is extended to and including October 4, 2019.|
|Sep 03 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 16 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Sep 18 2019||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.|
|Oct 04 2019||Brief of respondent Jackson Masonry, LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 11 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 11 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Oct 11 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 21 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 21 2019||Proposal of respondent to lodge copies of documents in related cases cited in respondent's brief on the merits filed.|
|Nov 04 2019||Reply of petitioner Ritzen Group, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 13 2019||Argued. For petitioner: James K. Lehman, Columbia, S. C. For respondent: Griffin S. Dunham, Nashville, Tenn.; and Vivek Suri, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.)|
|Jan 14 2020||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Ginsburg, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 18 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
The Supreme Court has rescinded its COVID-related orders related to filing, but no word on resuming in-person oral arguments in October.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.