| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22-181 | 6th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2022 |
Issues: (1) Whether under the voluntary cessation exception to mootness a government must satisfy the “absolutely clear” standard and, if not, to what extent the government should be treated differently from private defendants; (2) whether the government is owed a presumption of good faith under the voluntary cessation exception to mootness when it retains the authority and interest to re-impose its challenged policy; and (3) whether a claim is capable of repetition yet evading review when the government retains the authority to re-issue a restriction that imposes the same harm in the same way.
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| Aug 23 2022 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 28, 2022) |
| Sep 08 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Dana Nessel, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Michigan to respond filed. |
| Sep 13 2022 | Waiver of right of respondent Elizabeth Hertel, Director, Michigan Department of Health and Human Services to respond filed. |
| Sep 26 2022 | Waiver of right of respondents Linda Vail, Ingham County Health Officer; and Carol A. Siemon, Ingham County Prosecuting Attorney to respond filed. |
| Sep 28 2022 | Brief amici curiae of California Rental Housing Association, et al. filed. |
| Oct 12 2022 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/28/2022. |
| Oct 31 2022 | Petition DENIED. |
