|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-778||6th Cir.||Apr 24, 2019||Jun 10, 2019||9-0||Kavanaugh||OT 2018|
Disclosure: Vinson & Elkins LLP, whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.
Holding: Michigan’s third-degree home-invasion statute substantially corresponds to or is narrower than generic burglary for purposes of qualifying for enhanced sentencing under the Armed Career Criminal Act.
Judgment: Affirmed, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Kavanaugh on June 10, 2019. Justice Thomas filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 13 2017||Application (17A296) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from September 26, 2017 to November 24, 2017, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Sep 15 2017||Application (17A296) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 24, 2017.|
|Nov 24 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2017)|
|Dec 19 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2017 to January 29, 2017, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 20 2017||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 29, 2018.|
|Dec 28 2017||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Jan 17 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 29, 2018 to February 28, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 18 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including February 28, 2018.|
|Feb 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 28, 2018 to March 30, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 23 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 30, 2018.|
|Mar 30 2018||Brief of respondent United States of America filed.|
|Apr 06 2018||Waiver of the 14-day waiting period under Rule 15.5 filed by petitioner.|
|Apr 10 2018||Reply of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed.|
|Apr 11 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/27/2018.|
|Dec 13 2018||Supplemental brief of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 20 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/11/2019.|
|Jan 11 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 11 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 24, 2019|
|Feb 20 2019||Joint appendix filed.|
|Feb 20 2019||Brief of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed.|
|Feb 27 2019||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Feb 27 2019||Brief amici curiae of Federal Public Defenders for the Northern, Western, and Southern Districts of Texas filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 20 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Mar 20 2019||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.|
|Mar 22 2019||Brief of respondent United States filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 15 2019||Reply of petitioner Jamar Quarles filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 24 2019||Argued. For petitioner: Jeremy C. Marwell, Washington, D. C. For respondent: Zachary D. Tripp, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 10 2019||Adjudged to be AFFIRMED. Kavanaugh, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Thomas, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 12 2019||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
Having covered the Supreme Court for six decades, @lylden has seen a lot of changes at 1 First Street. In the latest piece in our series on the post-COVID court, Lyle examines how the court's pandemic operations could spur permanent reform.
How has COVID-19 changed the Supreme Court? And are any of those changes worth keeping? Today we launch a symposium examining those questions.
First up, a piece from @stevenmazie on how to reform oral arguments after the pandemic.
The court after COVID: A recipe for oral argument reform - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court has not yet announced whether it will return to normal operations when the 2021-22 term begins ...
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.