|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-1158||2nd Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2022|
Issue: Whether a private citizen who holds no elected office or government employment, but has informal political or other influence over governmental decisionmaking, owes a fiduciary duty to the general public such that he can be convicted of honest-services fraud.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 04 2022||Application (21A298) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 30, 2022 to March 1, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.|
|Jan 07 2022||Application (21A298) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 1, 2022.|
|Feb 17 2022||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 24, 2022)|
|Mar 17 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 24, 2022 to April 25, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 21 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 25, 2022.|
|Mar 24 2022||Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed. VIDED.|
|Apr 05 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 25, 2022 to May 24, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 07 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2022.|
|May 24 2022||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Jun 03 2022||Reply of petitioner Joseph Percoco filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 07 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.|
|Jun 29 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.|
|Jun 30 2022||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 13 2022||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 22 2022||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 31, 2022. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 18, 2022.|
|Aug 31 2022||Brief of petitioner Joseph Percoco filed.|
|Aug 31 2022||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 31 2022||Brief of respondent Steven Aiello filed.|
|Sep 07 2022||Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 07 2022||Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Sep 07 2022||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Sep 07 2022||Brief amici curiae of Citizens United, et al. filed.|
We are honored to be chosen as the winner of an American Journalism Online Award for Best Non-profit News Source. Thanks to everyone for reading & supporting SCOTUSblog, including on our opinion-day live blogs, which the awarding judge called a "digital townsquare." #AJOawards
The winner of the award for Best Non-Profit News Source is @scotusblog. Judge @juliachanb called the site “a crucial tool in a political journalist’s toolbox” and praised their recent site revamp and dedication to transparency. https://www.scotusblog.com 2/
Quick Tok explainer on yesterday’s voting rights case at the Supreme Court—Merrill v. Milligan.
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...