|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-1126||7th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provides a “good-faith defense” to private entities who violate another’s constitutional rights before the courts have clearly established the illegality of their conduct; and (2) whether the defenses of qualified immunity or “good faith” allow a defendant who takes another person’s money or property in violation of the Constitution—but in reliance on a statute or court ruling that purported to authorize its conduct and is only later declared unconstitutional—to keep that money or property when the owner sues for its return.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Mar 10 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 13, 2020)|
|Mar 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 13, 2020 to May 13, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 13, 2020.|
|May 11 2020||Brief of respondents Illinois Education Association, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Jun 02 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/18/2020.|
|Jun 09 2020||Reply of petitioner Stacey Mooney filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 16 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/25/2020.|
|Jun 23 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Jul 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Aug 04 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Sep 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 13 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.|
|Oct 14 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Oct 26 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.|
|Oct 29 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 04 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/20/2020.|
|Nov 10 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Dec 30 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/15/2021.|
|Jan 14 2021||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 19 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/22/2021.|
|Jan 25 2021||Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.