|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-440||Fed. Cir.||Apr 21, 2021||Jun 29, 2021||5-4||Kagan||OT 2020|
Holding: The well-grounded patent law doctrine of assignor estoppel applies only when the assignor’s claim of invalidity contradicts explicit or implicit representations the assignor made in assigning the patent.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 5-4, in an opinion by Justice Kagan on June 29, 2021. Justice Alito filed a dissenting opinion. Justice Barrett filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justices Thomas and Gorsuch joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Sep 30 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 5, 2020)|
|Oct 14 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Minerva Surgical, Inc.|
|Nov 05 2020||Brief of respondents Hologic, Inc., et al. in opposition filed.|
|Nov 05 2020||Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Professors filed.|
|Nov 05 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.|
|Nov 24 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/11/2020.|
|Nov 24 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Nov 24 2020||Reply of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed.|
|Dec 09 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.|
|Jan 08 2021||Petition GRANTED.|
|Feb 22 2021||Brief of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed.|
|Feb 22 2021||Joint appendix volumes 1 and 2 with supplemental appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Feb 22 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Minerva Surgical, Inc.|
|Feb 25 2021||Brief amicus curiae of New York Intellectual Property Law Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Feb 26 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amici curiae of Intellectual Property Law Professors filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Intellectual Property Owners Association filed in support of neither party.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of American Intellectual Property Law Association filed in support of neither party.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of United States in support of neither party filed.|
|Mar 01 2021||Brief amicus curiae of New York City Bar Association in support of neither party filed.|
|Mar 12 2021||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 21, 2021.|
|Mar 15 2021||Record requested.|
|Mar 24 2021||Brief of respondents Hologic, Inc., et al. filed.|
|Mar 26 2021||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Mar 30 2021||CIRCULATED|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of United Therapeutics Corp. filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America filed. (Distributed)|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amici curiae of Leading Technology Composites, Inc. and Clarkwestern Dietrich Building Systems LLC filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 05 2021||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Apr 07 2021||Reply of petitioner Minerva Surgical, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Apr 21 2021||Argued. For petitioner: Robert N. Hochman, Chicago, Ill. For United States, as amicus curiae: Morgan L. Ratner, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Matthew M. Wolf, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 29 2021||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Kagan, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined. Alito, J., filed a dissenting opinion. Barrett, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Thomas and Gorsuch, JJ., joined.|
|Aug 02 2021||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW: The Supreme Court will review the legality of Biden's student-debt relief plan. The justices will hear oral argument in February. In the meantime, the plan remains blocked as a result of lower-court rulings.
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.