|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|13-1010||6th Cir.||Nov 10, 2014||Jan 26, 2015||9-0||Thomas||OT 2014|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, filed an amicus brief in support of neither party in this case.
Holding: To determine whether retiree health-care benefits survive the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement, courts should apply ordinary contract principles. Those principles do not include the Sixth Circuit’s inference that parties to collective bargaining would intend retiree benefits to vest for life.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on January 26, 2015.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 10 2014||Application (13A753) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 20, 2014 to February 20, 2014, submitted to Justice Kagan.|
|Jan 16 2014||Application (13A753) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 20, 2014.|
|Feb 20 2014||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 26, 2014)|
|Mar 26 2014||Brief of respondents Hobert Freel Tackett, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 7 2014||Reply of petitioners M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Apr 9 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014.|
|Apr 28 2014||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 2, 2014.|
|May 5 2014||Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition.|
|May 9 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 10, 2014.|
|Jun 20 2014||Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners.|
|Jul 8 2014||Consent to the filing ofamicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents.|
|Jul 10 2014||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 17, 2014.|
|Jul 10 2014||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 15, 2014.|
|Jul 17 2014||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Jul 17 2014||Brief of petitioners M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Jul 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of Council on Labor Law Equality and the Society for Human Resource Management filed.|
|Jul 24 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., in support of neither party filed.|
|Jul 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of ERISA Industry Committee and the American Benefits Council filed.|
|Jul 24 2014||Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the Business Roundtable filed.|
|Jul 24 2014||Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Manufacturers filed.|
|Jul 24 2014||Brief amicus curiae of Whirlpool Corporation filed.|
|Sep 4 2014||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 10, 2014.|
|Sep 8 2014||Record requested from U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit.|
|Sep 15 2014||Brief of respondents Hobert Freel Tackett, et al. filed.|
|Sep 15 2014||Record received from U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic.|
|Sep 19 2014||CIRCULATED|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Labor and Benefits Law Professors filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amici curiae of Fox Retiree Committee, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 22 2014||Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 15 2014||Reply of petitioners M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 10 2014||Argued. For petitioners: Allyson N. Ho, Dallas, Tex. For respondents: Julia P. Clark, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 26 2015||Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined.|
|Feb 27 2015||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.