|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-507||6th Cir.||Not Argued||Mar 29, 2021||8-1||Per Curiam||OT 2020|
Holding: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit erred in revisiting on federal habeas review the decision of a Tennessee court supported by ample evidence that did not exceed the possibility of fairminded disagreement supporting that court’s conclusion.
Judgment: Reversed in a per curiam opinion on March 29, 2021. Justice Sotomayor dissents.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Oct 13 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 16, 2020)|
|Nov 06 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 16, 2020 to January 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Nov 09 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 15, 2021.|
|Jan 15 2021||Brief of respondent Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines in opposition filed.|
|Jan 15 2021||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Anthony Darrell Dugard Hines.|
|Jan 27 2021||Reply of petitioner Tony Mays, Warden filed.|
|Jan 27 2021||Proof of Service filed with respect to reply brief of petitioner.|
|Feb 03 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/19/2021.|
|Feb 05 2021||Record Requested.|
|Feb 26 2021||Record received from the U.S.C.A. for the Sixth Circuit (3 boxes of state court records).|
|Mar 03 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/19/2021.|
|Mar 22 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/26/2021.|
|Mar 29 2021||Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.|
|Mar 29 2021||Petition GRANTED and judgment REVERSED. Justice Sotomayor dissents. Opinion per curiam. (Detached Opinion)|
|Apr 23 2021||Petition for Rehearing filed.|
|May 04 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.