Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
14-132 | 9th Cir. | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | OT 2014 |
Issue: Whether this Court has “clearly established,” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), that where a state appellate court concludes certain pretrial statements should have been excluded from the prosecution’s case under Miranda v. Arizona, the court’s harmless error analysis must ignore the fact that the defendant also took the stand at trial and admitted the conduct involved in the offense.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jun 20 2014 | Application (13A1269) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 3, 2014 to August 4, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy. |
Jun 26 2014 | Application (13A1269) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until August 4, 2014. |
Aug 4 2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 5, 2014) |
Aug 4 2014 | Appendix of Michael F. Martel, Warden filed. |
Aug 26 2014 | Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 6, 2014. |
Sep 30 2014 | Brief of respondent Reuben Kenneth Lujan in opposition filed. |
Sep 30 2014 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Reuben Kenneth Lujan. |
Oct 14 2014 | Reply of petitioner Michael F. Martel, Warden filed. (Distributed) |
Oct 15 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 31, 2014. |
Nov 3 2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 7, 2014. |
Nov 10 2014 | Petition DENIED. |
Nov 10 2014 | Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED. |
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
www.scotusblog.com
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.