Martel v. Lujan

Petition for certiorari denied on November 10, 2014
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
14-132 9th Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2014

Issue: Whether this Court has “clearly established,” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d)(1), that where a state appellate court concludes certain pretrial statements should have been excluded from the prosecution’s case under Miranda v. Arizona, the court’s harmless error analysis must ignore the fact that the defendant also took the stand at trial and admitted the conduct involved in the offense.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jun 20 2014Application (13A1269) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 3, 2014 to August 4, 2014, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Jun 26 2014Application (13A1269) granted by Justice Kennedy extending the time to file until August 4, 2014.
Aug 4 2014Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 5, 2014)
Aug 4 2014Appendix of Michael F. Martel, Warden filed.
Aug 26 2014Order extending time to file response to petition to and including October 6, 2014.
Sep 30 2014Brief of respondent Reuben Kenneth Lujan in opposition filed.
Sep 30 2014Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent Reuben Kenneth Lujan.
Oct 14 2014Reply of petitioner Michael F. Martel, Warden filed. (Distributed)
Oct 15 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of October 31, 2014.
Nov 3 2014DISTRIBUTED for Conference of November 7, 2014.
Nov 10 2014Petition DENIED.
Nov 10 2014Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed by respondent GRANTED.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
Awards