|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|14-1055||9th Cir.||Nov 8, 2016||Jan 18, 2017||8-0||Sotomayor||OT 2016|
Holding: Fannie Mae's sue-and-be-sued clause does not grant federal courts jurisdiction over all cases involving Fannie Mae.
Judgment: Reversed, 8-0, in an opinion by Justice Sotomayor on January 18, 2017.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 17 2015||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 2, 2015)|
|Feb 17 2015||Appendix of Crystal Monique Lightfoot, et al. filed.|
|Mar 30 2015||Waiver of right of respondents Fannie Mae to respond filed.|
|Apr 15 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 1, 2015.|
|Apr 22 2015||Response Requested . (Due May 22, 2015)|
|Apr 30 2015||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including June 22, 2015.|
|May 22 2015||Brief amicus curiae of The American Association for Justice filed.|
|Jun 22 2015||Brief of respondent Fannie Mae in opposition filed.|
|Jul 8 2015||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of September 28, 2015.|
|Jul 8 2015||Reply of petitioners Crystal Monique Lightfoot, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 5 2015||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|May 23 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Jun 7 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 23, 2016.|
|Jun 7 2016||Supplemental brief of respondent Fannie Mae filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 27 2016||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 27, 2016.|
|Jun 28 2016||Petition GRANTED.|
|Aug 5 2016||The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including August 16, 2016.|
|Aug 5 2016||The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 19, 2016.|
|Aug 16 2016||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed.)|
|Aug 16 2016||Brief of petitioners Crystal Monique Lightfoot, et al. filed.|
|Aug 23 2016||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Aug 23 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The American Red Cross in support of neither party filed.|
|Aug 23 2016||Brief amicus curiae of The American Association for Justice filed.|
|Sep 2 2016||SET FOR ARGUMENT On Tuesday, November 8, 2016|
|Sep 9 2016||Record has been requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit.|
|Sep 19 2016||Brief of respondent Fannie Mae filed.|
|Sep 21 2016||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Also received are documents from the district court that was filed in hardcopy only. This document has been transferred electronically, the remaining district court documents are available on PACER.|
|Sep 22 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Sep 28 2016||CIRCULATED|
|Oct 17 2016||Motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Oct 19 2016||Reply of petitioners Crystal Monique Lightfoot, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 8 2016||Argued. For petitioner: E. Joshua Rosenkranz, New York, N. Y.; and Ann O'Connell, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Brian P. Brooks, Washington, D. C.|
|Jan 18 2017||Judgment REVERSED. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court.|
|Feb 21 2017||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The clerk of the court just notified counsel in a juvenile sentencing case—that was sent back to a lower court this week in light of the court's decision in Jones v. Mississippi—that Justice Kagan unwittingly failed to recuse herself after participating in part of the case as SG.
It’s a quiet week, so now is a great time to listen to Judge John Owens regale @AHoweBlogger with the tale of Ashton Embry and the greatest leak in Supreme Court history.
Come for the high drama, stay for the good humor and an RBG story or two.
The biggest leak in Supreme Court history - SCOTUSblog
In a city full of anonymous sources, the Supreme Court is famously leak-proof. But a century ago, the court had ...
The US Supreme Court should overturn the Facebook’s “Oversight Board’s” “ruling” which upholds the outlawing of the 45th President of the United States from social media.
This is a big tech, corporate oligarchy without standing and it’s gone too far. Enough is enough.
The Supreme Court will hear its last case of the term today at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Here’s a summary of Terry v. United States in a TikTok minute.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will tackle the legacy of the Reagan-era War on Drugs and Congress' attempt to reduce the punishment disparity between crack-cocaine and powder cocaine offenses.
As @ekownyankah notes, this case has a little bit of everything.
In final case the court will hear this term, profound issues of race, incarceration and the war on drugs - SCOTUSblog
Academics naturally believe that even obscure cases in their field are underappreciated; each minor tax or bankruptcy ...
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket filing in which a church argues that state COVID-related restrictions lack sufficient carveouts for religious worship. This one challenges Colorado's restrictions. It relies heavily on last month's ruling in Tandon v. Newsom.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.