|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-1195||10th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issues: (1) Whether a party vindicating a procedural injury lacks standing unless it can establish with certainty that procedural compliance would change the outcome of subsequent agency action; and (2) whether, under the strong presumption favoring judicial review of agency action, agency violations of the Congressional Review Act’s rule-submission requirement are subject to judicial review.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 25 2021||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 31, 2021)|
|Mar 04 2021||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Kansas Natural Resource Coalition|
|Mar 23 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 31, 2021 to April 30, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 24 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 30, 2021.|
|Mar 29 2021||Brief amici curiae of Judicial Watch, Inc., and the Allied Educational Foundation filed.|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Buckeye Institute filed.|
|Mar 31 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Apr 26 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 30, 2021 to May 14, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 27 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 14, 2021.|
|May 14 2021||Brief of respondents United States Department of Interior, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 17 2021||Letter waiving the 14-day waiting period for the filing of a reply pursuant to Rule 15.5 filed.|
|May 18 2021||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.|
|May 18 2021||Reply of Kansas Natural Resource Coalition submitted.|
|Jun 07 2021||Petition DENIED.|
BREAKING: The court rules in favor of a Catholic social services organization that sued Philadelphia after the city excluded it from a foster-care program due to the organization's refusal to certify same-sex couples as foster parents. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-123_g3bi.pdf
In second opinion of the day, SCOTUS sides with food giants Nestle and Cargill in a lawsuit brought by six citizens of Mali who say the companies facilitated human rights abuses by purchasing cocoa from plantations in Ivory Coast where they were enslaved as children.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court rejects the constitutional challenge to Obamacare in 7-2 opinion. The court tosses the lawsuit because the challengers do not have legal standing to sue. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/20pdf/19-840_6jfm.pdf
With 18 cases outstanding, the Supreme Court will release opinions at 10:00 a.m. ET.
We’re waiting for decisions on the ACA, voting rights, LGBTQ+ rights/religious liberty, NCAA student-athlete compensation, and student speech.
Live blog starts at 9:45.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, June 17 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, June 17, as the court releases one or more opinions in argued cases from...
Monday's decision rejecting sentence reductions for low-level crack-cocaine offenders may have been unanimous, but @ekownyankah writes that there is far more going on than the ruling's dry textual analysis might indicate. Read his incisive analysis here:
After decades, Congress reduced the racially unjust crack/cocaine disparity... raising amounts required for prison time. Why would Congress have left small time dealers to rot in prison for decades?
My thoughts on SCOTUS's ruling in Terry v. United States:https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/unanimous-ruling-on-crack-cocaine-disparity-is-heavy-on-text-light-on-history/
No more SCOTUS opinions for today. There are 18 cases still outstanding from the current term, including disputes over Obamacare, religious rights and voting rights. The next opinion day that we know of is Thursday.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.