|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-753||5th Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issues: Whether, if the barrel of a gun is not yet pointed directly at an officer, clearly established federal law prohibits police officers from firing to stop a person armed with a firearm from moving a deadly weapon toward an officer if the officer has not both shouted a warning and also waited to determine whether the imminent threat to life has subsided after the warning; and (2) whether a police officer who inaccurately reports his perceptions of events during a dynamic shooting encounter violates clearly established rights under the 14th Amendment.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Nov 05 2019||Application (19A510) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from November 18, 2019 to December 9, 2019, submitted to Justice Alito.|
|Nov 07 2019||Application (19A510) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until December 9, 2019.|
|Dec 09 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 13, 2020)|
|Jan 13 2020||Brief amici curiae of International Association of Chiefs of Police, et al. filed.|
|Jan 28 2020||Waiver of right of respondents Randy Cole, et al. to respond filed.|
|Jan 29 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Jan 31 2020||Response Requested. (Due March 2, 2020)|
|Feb 20 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2020 to April 1, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Feb 21 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 1, 2020.|
|Mar 24 2020||Brief of respondents Randy Cole, et al. in opposition filed.|
|Apr 03 2020||Reply of petitioners Martin Hunter, et al. filed.|
|Apr 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/24/2020.|
|Apr 20 2020||Rescheduled.|
|Apr 28 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/15/2020.|
|May 13 2020||Rescheduled.|
|May 18 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/21/2020.|
|May 22 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/28/2020.|
|Jun 01 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Just in: The next Supreme Court opinion day will be next Monday. The court expects to release one or more opinions in argued cases from the current term.
End of an era: Here is NBC News prez Noah Oppenheim's memo about Pete Williams' plan to retire this summer
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/