|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-415||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court based on the scope of the claims or a question of fact for the jury based on the state of the art at the time of the patent. CVSG: 12/6/2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 20 2018||Application (18A88) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 29, 2018 to September 28, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 25 2018||Application (18A88) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 28, 2018.|
|Sep 28 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)|
|Oct 08 2018||Waiver of right of respondent Steven E. Berkheimer to respond filed.|
|Oct 10 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 15 2018||Response Requested. (Due November 14, 2018)|
|Oct 17 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, HP Inc., f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company.|
|Oct 22 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Steven E. Berkheimer.|
|Oct 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2018 to December 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 24 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 5, 2018.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Askeladden LLC filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amici curiae of T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P. filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amici curiae of Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and CableLabs filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation and R Street Institute filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.|
|Dec 05 2018||Brief of respondent Steven E. Berkheimer in opposition filed.|
|Dec 17 2018||Reply of petitioner HP Inc., f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Dec 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner HP Inc., f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jan 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Today at SCOTUS: One oral argument on the statute of limitations in the Quiet Title Act. Is it "jurisdictional"? Or just a "claim-processing rule"? That might sound arcane, but cases like these affect the ability of citizens to sue the federal government.
A squabble over a forest road may pave the way for further narrowing of “jurisdictional” timing rules - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Wilkins v. United States is next in a protracted line of cases in which the court ...
Bribery or lobbying?
Percoco v. United States in a TikTok minute.
JUST IN: For the second time in the past week, SCOTUS denies an emergency request to block the execution of Kevin Johnson. The execution is scheduled for tonight in Missouri. Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissent from the brief order allowing the execution to proceed.
Today at SCOTUS: Can the federal government prioritize certain groups of unauthorized immigrants for deportation over others? And do states have standing to sue the government if they disagree with those priorities? @AHoweBlogger previews U.S. v. Texas:
In U.S. v. Texas, broad questions over immigration enforcement and states’ ability to challenge federal policies - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument on Tuesday in a dispute over the Biden administration’s authority to...
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral arguments in a pair of public-corruption cases, both stemming from scandals in New York politics that arose during Andrew Cuomo's time as governor. In both cases, the defendants are claiming prosecutorial overreach.