|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-415||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether patent eligibility is a question of law for the court based on the scope of the claims or a question of fact for the jury based on the state of the art at the time of the patent. CVSG: 12/6/2019.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 20 2018||Application (18A88) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from August 29, 2018 to September 28, 2018, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|Jul 25 2018||Application (18A88) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until September 28, 2018.|
|Sep 28 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 2, 2018)|
|Oct 08 2018||Waiver of right of respondent Steven E. Berkheimer to respond filed.|
|Oct 10 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 15 2018||Response Requested. (Due November 14, 2018)|
|Oct 17 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, HP Inc., f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company.|
|Oct 22 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Steven E. Berkheimer.|
|Oct 22 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 14, 2018 to December 5, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 24 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 5, 2018.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Askeladden LLC filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amici curiae of T-Mobile USA, Inc., and Sprint Spectrum L.P. filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Computer & Communications Industry Association filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amici curiae of Check Point Software Technologies, Inc. and CableLabs filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amici curiae of Electronic Frontier Foundation and R Street Institute filed.|
|Nov 14 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Engine Advocacy filed.|
|Dec 05 2018||Brief of respondent Steven E. Berkheimer in opposition filed.|
|Dec 17 2018||Reply of petitioner HP Inc., f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company filed.|
|Dec 19 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/4/2019.|
|Jan 07 2019||The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States.|
|Dec 06 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Dec 20 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner HP Inc., f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company filed.|
|Dec 23 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/10/2020.|
|Jan 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Today at the court:
A nuts-and-bolts question of civil procedure. After an appeal is decided, do courts have discretion to limit the administrative “costs” that the prevailing party can recover from the losing party?
Argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EDT.
Justices to consider awards of costs of appellate litigation - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in City of San Antonio v. Hotels.com brings the justices a basic nuts-and-bolts question of...
In 2019, the Supreme Court limited the scope of a federal law that bans people convicted of felonies from having a gun. Up this morning at the court: back-to-back cases that will decide how many felon-in-possession convictions will need new trials or pleas under that 2019 ruling.
NEW: SCOTUS adds one new case to its docket for next term: Hemphill v. New York, a criminal-procedure case about the interaction between hearsay rules and the right of defendants to confront witnesses against them. Still no action on major petitions involving guns and abortion.
The court will release orders at 9:30 a.m. EDT followed by oral argument in two cases.
First, whether Alaska Native regional and village corporations are “Indian Tribes” for purposes of CARES Act Covid-related relief.
By @StanfordLaw’s Gregory Ablavsky.
Are Alaska Native corporations Indian tribes? A multimillion-dollar question - SCOTUSblog
Are Alaska Native corporations — special corporations that Congress created in 1971 when it resolved Native claims ...
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.