|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-963||5th Cir.||Dec 8, 2020||Jan 25, 2021||N/A||Per Curiam||OT 2020|
Holding: Certiorari dismissed as improvidently granted.
Judgment: Dismissed in a per curiam opinion on January 25, 2021.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 31 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 2, 2020)|
|Mar 02 2020||Brief of respondent Archer and White Sales, Inc. in opposition filed.|
|May 19 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/4/2020.|
|May 21 2020||Reply of petitioner Henry Schein, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 08 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/11/2020.|
|Jun 15 2020||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jun 25 2020||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 08 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Henry Schein, Inc.|
|Jul 13 2020||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 21, 2020. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 13, 2020.|
|Aug 21 2020||Motion for leave to file the joint appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record filed by petitioner Henry Schein, Inc.|
|Aug 21 2020||Joint appendix (Redacted copies for the Public) filed.|
|Aug 21 2020||Brief of petitioner Henry Schein, Inc. filed.|
|Aug 25 2020||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Archer and White Sales, Inc.|
|Aug 26 2020||Motion DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.|
|Aug 28 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Aug 28 2020||Brief amicus curiae of DRI - The Voice of the Defense Bar filed.|
|Aug 28 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Benco Dental Supply Company filed.|
|Sep 16 2020||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, December 8, 2020.|
|Oct 05 2020||Motion of petitioner for leave to file the joint appendix under seal with redacted copies for the public record GRANTED.|
|Oct 08 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.|
|Oct 13 2020||Brief of respondent Archer and White Sales, Inc. filed.|
|Oct 14 2020||Record received from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER.|
|Oct 19 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Professor George A. Bermann filed.|
|Oct 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of Professors Daniel D. Barnhizer, et al. filed.|
|Oct 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of Arbitrators, Arbitration Practitioners, and Arbitration Scholars filed.|
|Oct 20 2020||Brief amicus curiae of Constitutional Accountability Center filed.|
|Oct 20 2020||Brief amici curiae of American Association for Justice & Public Justice filed.|
|Oct 20 2020||Brief amicus curiae of William R. Weinstein filed.|
|Oct 27 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 12 2020||Reply of petitioner Henry Schein, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 08 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Kannon K. Shanmugam, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Daniel L. Geyser, Dallas, Tex.|
|Jan 25 2021||Writ of certiorari DISMISSED as improvidently granted. Opinion per curiam.|
|Feb 26 2021||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
In advance of tomorrow's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, we asked experts and advocates on both sides of the abortion debate to weigh in on how the court should approach the case. You can read our full symposium here:
Symposium before oral argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization - SCOTUSblog
Independent News and Analysis on the U.S. Supreme Court
Today at SCOTUS: Two oral arguments starting at 10 a.m. EST. One is on federal anti-discrimination laws. The other is on Medicare payments for drugs dispensed by hospitals -- with big questions about the doctrine of Chevron deference lurking in the background.
Bill Cosby’s prosecutors asked the Supreme Court to reinstate his conviction today. Quick explainer.
In our latest episode of SCOTUStalk, @shefalil of @19thnews joined us to preview Wednesday's argument in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health. Shefali explains the current state of abortion access and the case's implications in Mississippi and across America.
Roe, Dobbs, and the current state of abortion access - SCOTUSblog
In advance of Wednesday's oral argument in the momentous abortion case, Shefali Luthra, a gender and health care r...
Update: Without calling for a response or referring the case to the full court, Justice Breyer just rejected last week's challenge from Massachusetts hospital workers who object to the hospital's COVID vaccine mandate.
(Breyer handles emergency requests from Massachusetts.)
JUST IN: Another shadow-docket challenge to a COVID vaccine mandate. This one is from employees at Mass General Brigham who say the Boston-based hospital violated federal law by not granting them exemptions from the hospital's vaccine policy. Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/21A175.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: The justices return to the bench for oral argument in a case about Medicare payments to hospitals that serve low-income patients. Lots of money at stake, plus potential implications for the Chevron doctrine. @JACoganJr explains the case:
Money for safety-net hospitals at stake in dispute over Medicare payment formula - SCOTUSblog
When it comes to highlighting the complexity of the Medicare Act and its hospital payment rules, Becerra v. Empire...