|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|17-1679||Fed. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2018|
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has jurisdiction under 38 U.S.C. § 502 to review an interpretive rule reflecting the Department of Veterans Affairs’ definitive interpretation of its own regulation, even if the VA chooses to promulgate that rule through its adjudication manual.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jun 19 2018||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 20, 2018)|
|Jul 11 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 20, 2018 to August 20, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 12 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 20, 2018.|
|Jul 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program (NVLSP) filed.|
|Jul 20 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc.(NOVA), et al. filed.|
|Jul 27 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 20, 2018 to September 7, 2018, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 30 2018||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 7, 2018.|
|Sep 07 2018||Brief of respondent Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 25 2018||Reply of petitioner Robert Gray filed.|
|Sep 26 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/12/2018.|
|Oct 10 2018||Supplemental brief of petitioner Robert Gray filed. (Distributed)|
|Oct 22 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/26/2018.|
|Oct 29 2018||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/2/2018.|
|Nov 02 2018||Petition GRANTED.|
|Dec 07 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Jeremy C. Doerre filed.|
|Dec 17 2018||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Dec 17 2018||Brief of petitioner Robert Gray filed.|
|Dec 17 2018||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Robert Gray.|
|Dec 20 2018||Amicus brief of Natioinal Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium not accepted for filing. (December 20, 2018 -- Corrected version submitted)|
|Dec 20 2018||Brief amicus curiae of National Law School Veterans Clinic Consortium filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, February 25, 2019.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Veterans Legal Services Program (NVLSP), et al. filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amicus curiae of Blue Water Navy Vietnam Veterans Association filed.|
|Dec 21 2018||Brief amici curiae of National Organization of Veterans' Advocates, Inc.(NOVA), et al. filed.|
|Jan 11 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit.|
|Jan 15 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 16 2019||Brief of respondent Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 28 2019||Record from the U.S.C.A. Federal Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. The record is complete.|
|Feb 01 2019||Memorandum of the respondent suggesting that the case may become moot filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 04 2019||Petitioner's response to memorandum suggesting that the case may become moot filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 05 2019||Letter from petitioner updating Clerk on action in related case filed. (Distributed)|
|Feb 06 2019||The case is REMOVED FROM THE ARGUMENT CALENDAR for Monday, February 25, 2019.|
|Feb 07 2019||The briefing schedule is suspended pending further order of the Court.|
|Jun 04 2019||Motion to dismiss as moot filed by respondent Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Veterans Affairs.|
|Jun 13 2019||Response to motion to dismiss as moot from petitioner Robert Gray filed.|
|Jun 17 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 24 2019||The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit with instructions to dismiss the case as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36 (1950).|
|Jul 26 2019||JUDGMENT SSUED.|
It's official: In the first-ever SCOTUS bracketology tournament, our readers have chosen CHIEF JUSTICE EARL WARREN as the greatest justice in history. The author of Brown v. Board, Loving v. Virginia, and Miranda v. Arizona defeated top-seeded John Marshall in the final round.
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here: https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/04/the-great-chief-and-the-super-chief-a-final-showdown-in-supreme-court-march-madness/
Cast your vote below!
NEW: The Supreme Court will issue opinion(s?) next Thursday April 22. We’re still waiting on decisions in the ACA case and Fulton v. City of Philadelphia about religious liberty and LGBT rights.
Four Democrats unveiled legislation today to expand the size of the Supreme Court from nine justices to 13 -- but Democratic leaders in both the House and Senate quickly threw cold water on the proposal.
Here's our report from @jamesromoser:
Bill to enlarge the Supreme Court faces dim prospects in Congress - SCOTUSblog
Four congressional Democrats introduced legislation Thursday to expand the number of seats on the Supreme Court from ...
We're so excited about our April 15 Live Webinar (w/ @HarvardACS & @HarvardFedSoc), Covering the Court, featuring an all-star lineup of panelists @jduffyrice, @katieleebarlow, @whignewtons, & @stevenmazie! _👩⚖️👩⚖️👩⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️👨⚖️_ Register here ➡️ https://harvard.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_k_b_9IPBQ_GV37rpsjF9kw
Senator Markey (D-Ma) is delivering remarks right now in front of the Supreme Court introducing the Judiciary Act of 2021 to expand the court to 13 justices. He’s flanked by Chairman of House Judiciary, Jerry Nadler (D-NY), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga).
We've reached the final round of SCOTUS bracketology, and two illustrious chief justices are facing off for the championship. One wrote Marbury v. Madison. The other wrote Brown v. Board. Our full write-up on both finalists is here:
Cast your vote below!
The “great chief” and the “super chief”: A final showdown in Supreme Court March Madness - SCOTUSblog
Forget Ali vs. Frazier, Celtics vs. Lakers, or Evert vs. Navratilova. It’s time for Marshall vs. Warren. After...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.