|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1048||11th Cir.||Jan 21, 2020||Jun 1, 2020||9-0||Thomas||OT 2019|
Holding: The Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards does not conflict with domestic equitable estoppel doctrines that permit the enforcement of arbitration agreements by nonsignatories to those agreements.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 1, 2020. Justice Sotomayor filed a concurring opinion.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Feb 07 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 13, 2019)|
|Feb 27 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. to respond filed.|
|Mar 08 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC|
|Mar 13 2019||Waiver of right of respondents Sompo Japan Insurance Company of America, et al. to respond filed.|
|Mar 13 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers filed.|
|Mar 20 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2019.|
|Mar 28 2019||Response Requested. (Due April 29, 2019)|
|Apr 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2019 to May 21, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 15 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended for all respondents to and including May 21, 2019.|
|May 21 2019||Brief of Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC in opposition not accepted for filing. (May 30, 2019)(Corrected version submitted)|
|May 21 2019||Brief of respondents Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.(5/30/2019)|
|Jun 04 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/20/2019.|
|Jun 04 2019||Reply of petitioner GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/27/2019.|
|Jun 28 2019||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 17 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time within which to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 19 2019||Joint motion for an extension of time within which to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including September 17, 2019. The time to file respondents' briefs on the merits is extended to and including November 22, 2019.|
|Sep 17 2019||Brief of petitioner GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. filed.|
|Sep 17 2019||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of United States filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The North America Branch of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Manufacturers filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Public Justice in support of neither party filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amici curiae of Professor George A. Bermann, et al. filed.|
|Sep 24 2019||Brief amicus curiae of the Miami International Arbitration Society filed.|
|Nov 08 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Tuesday, January 21, 2020.|
|Nov 22 2019||Brief of respondents Outokumpu Stainless USA, LLC, et al. filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||CIRCULATED|
|Nov 26 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of Professors Benjamin G. Davis, et. al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Nov 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Public Citizen, Inc. filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 03 2019||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 1th Circuit.|
|Dec 05 2019||Record received from the U.S.D.C. Southern District of Alabama. The record is electronic and located on PACER with the exception of some SEALED documents that's electronic.|
|Dec 09 2019||Motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument GRANTED.|
|Dec 11 2019||The record received from the U.S.C.A. 11th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER, this record is complete.|
|Dec 23 2019||Letter pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 29.6 re Amendments to the Corporate Disclosure Statements filed. (Distributed)|
|Dec 23 2019||Reply of petitioner GE Energy Power Conversion France SAS, Corp. filed. (Distributed)|
|Jan 21 2020||Argued. For petitioner: Shay Dvoretzky, Washington, D. C.; and Jonathan Y. Ellis, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. (for United States, as amicus curiae.) For respondents: Jonathan D. Hacker, Washington, D. C.|
|Jun 01 2020||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Sotomayor, J., filed a concurring opinion.|
|Jul 06 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
NEW shadow-docket case: New York landlords ask SCOTUS for an emergency order to prevent the state from continuing to enforce its COVID-related eviction moratorium. They say the moratorium "runs roughshod" over their constitutional rights.
Filing here: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A8-1.pdf
New on the shadow docket: Florida seeks an emergency order blocking CDC policies that substantially limit cruise ships from sailing.
Florida asks #SCOTUS to block, pending appeal, CDC restrictions imposed on cruise industry b/c of COVID-19 pandemic: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/21A5.pdf
NEW: Mississippi formally asks the Supreme Court to overturn its landmark abortion case, Roe v. Wade, in latest court filing. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/19/19-1392/184703/20210722161332385_19-1392BriefForPetitioners.pdf
Biden’s SCOTUS reform commission met yesterday and discussed several reform ideas including adding justices and adopting a formal code of ethics.
Term limits emerged as a popular idea. But how to implement it — via statute or constitutional amendment?
Term limits emerge as popular proposal at latest meeting of court-reform commission - SCOTUSblog
The Presidential Commission on the Supreme Court reconvened on Tuesday to hear from a new set of experts on vari...
I really enjoyed getting to chat with the incomparable @AHoweBlogger about (1) why #SCOTUS's "shadow docket" *is* a big deal; (2) why it's so hard to figure out how to include it in broader assessments of the Justices' work; and (3) some possible ways to include it going forward. https://twitter.com/SCOTUSblog/status/1417545384314949635
How do you solve a problem like the shadow docket? @steve_vladeck has some thoughts and shared them with @AHoweBlogger in the latest SCOTUStalk.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.