|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issue: Whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which permanently prohibits nearly all felons—even those convicted of nonviolent crimes—from possessing firearms for self-defense, violates the Second Amendment, as applied to an individual convicted of willfully making a materially false statement on her tax returns.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 11 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 14, 2021)|
|Dec 29 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 14, 2021 to February 15, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Dec 31 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including February 16, 2021. See Rule 30.1.|
|Jan 12 2021||Brief amici curiae of Firearms Policy Foundation, California Gun Rights Foundation, Second Amendment Foundation, and Madison Society Foundation filed.|
|Jan 14 2021||Brief amicus curiae of The American Constitutional Rights Union filed.|
|Jan 14 2021||Brief amici curiae of The Cato Institute filed.|
|Jan 14 2021||Brief amicus curiae of Mountain States Legal Foundation's Center to Keep and Bear Arms filed.|
|Jan 21 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 16, 2021 to March 17, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jan 22 2021||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including March 17, 2021.|
Wait wut.. RBG ghost-wrote the equal protection bits of Obergefell?!
And I learned this on @SCOTUSblog’s TikTok?! https://www.tiktok.com/@scotusblog/video/6922179577724931333
"This is not our first commission rodeo” says Levy. 😉
Love this write up of the @BrookingsInst's panel yesterday with @Susan_Hennessey, @danepps,@cdkang76, and @mollyereynolds.
Thanks, @SCOTUSblog and Kalvis Golde!
Spilling SCOTUS tea on TikTok today. Well, actually, @eskridgebill spilled the tea, we just tok’d about it. 🍵
The Supreme Court got rid of several cases this morning -- in one fell swoop. Read @AHoweBlogger's latest coverage of the emoluments cases, spiritual advisers at Texas executions, Texas abortion policies, COVID restrictions, and NY political corruption.
Justices vacate rulings on Trump and emoluments - SCOTUSblog
The Supreme Court on Monday morning released orders from the justices’ private conference on Friday, Jan. 22. The justices once again did not ac...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.