Breaking News

Enplas Display Device Corp. v. Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd.

Petition for certiorari denied on November 4, 2019
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
18-1530 Fed. Cir. N/A N/A N/A N/A OT 2019

Issue: Whether, in view of the presumption against extraterritoriality, a foreign defendant’s foreign sales of components to a foreign company qualify as induced infringement, when the defendant knew of, at most, a risk that the components might be incorporated by third parties into infringing products that might be sold by other third parties in the United States.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jun 07 2019Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 11, 2019)
Jul 18 2019Waiver of right of respondent Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd. to respond filed.
Jul 31 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.
Aug 09 2019Response Requested. (Due September 9, 2019)
Sep 04 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 9, 2019 to September 19, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.
Sep 04 2019Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 19, 2019.
Sep 19 2019Brief of respondent Seoul Semiconductor Company, Ltd. in opposition filed.
Oct 08 2019Reply of petitioner Enplas Display Device Corporation filed. (Distributed)
Oct 09 2019DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/1/2019.
Nov 04 2019Petition DENIED.