Breaking News :

Breaking News :

Dailey v. Florida

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
19-1094 Fla. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issues: (1) Whether a defendant advancing a claim under Brady v. Maryland must demonstrate that he or she could not have uncovered the suppressed evidence through the exercise of due diligence; (2) whether the materiality of a Brady claim must be determined by considering the probative force of the withheld evidence cumulatively and in the context of the government’s entire case; and (3) whether the Florida Supreme Court’s error in treating petitioner’s claim under Giglio v. United States as though it alleged knowing use of perjury, when it actually alleged withholding exculpatory evidence, warrants reversal.

SCOTUSblog Coverage

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jan 21 2020Application (19A827) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 10, 2020 to March 1, 2020, submitted to Justice Thomas.
Jan 26 2020Application (19A827) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 1, 2020.
Mar 02 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 6, 2020)
Mar 23 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 6, 2020 to May 6, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
Mar 24 2020Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 6, 2020.
May 06 2020Brief of respondent Florida in opposition filed.
May 19 2020Motion of petitioner to delay distribution of the petition for a writ of certiorari under Rule 15.5 from May 26, 2020 to June16, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.
May 21 2020Motion to delay distribution of the petition for a writ certiorari granted; the petition will be distributed on June 17, 2020.
Jun 16 2020Reply of petitioner James Milton Dailey filed. (Distributed)
Jun 17 2020DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
 
Share:
Term Snapshot
At a Glance
Awards