|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|21-1170||2nd Cir.||TBD||TBD||TBD||TBD||OT 2022|
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit’s “right to control” theory of fraud — which treats the deprivation of complete and accurate information bearing on a person’s economic decision as a species of property fraud — states a valid basis for liability under the federal wire fraud statute.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jan 07 2022||Application (21A298) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until March 1, 2022.|
|Feb 18 2022||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 28, 2022)|
|Mar 23 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 28, 2022 to April 27, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Mar 24 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 27, 2022.|
|Mar 24 2022||Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed. VIDED.|
|Apr 05 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 27, 2022 to May 24, 2022, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Apr 07 2022||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including May 24, 2022.|
|May 24 2022||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Jun 06 2022||Reply of petitioner Louis Ciminelli filed. (Distributed)|
|Jun 07 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/23/2022.|
|Jun 29 2022||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.|
|Jun 30 2022||Petition GRANTED.|
|Jul 12 2022||Motion for an extension of time to file the briefs on the merits filed.|
|Jul 22 2022||Motion to extend the time to file the briefs on the merits granted. The time to file the joint appendix and petitioner's brief on the merits is extended to and including August 29, 2022. The time to file respondent's brief on the merits is extended to and including October 12, 2022.|
|Aug 29 2022||Brief of petitioner Louis Ciminelli filed.|
|Aug 29 2022||Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed)|
|Aug 29 2022||Brief of respondent Alain Kaloyeros in support of petitioner filed.|
|Aug 29 2022||Brief of respondents Steven Aiello and Joseph Gerardi in support of petitioner filed.|
|Sep 06 2022||Brief amici curiae of Law Professors filed.|
|Sep 06 2022||Amicus brief of New York Council of Defense Lawyers not accepted for filing.(Corrected version submitted) (September 13, 2022)|
|Sep 06 2022||Brief amicus curiae of New York Council of Defense Lawyers filed.(Sep. 13, 2022)|
|Sep 06 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Associated General Contractors of America, Inc filed.|
|Sep 06 2022||Brief amicus curiae of The National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed.|
|Sep 06 2022||Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America in support of neither party filed.|
We are honored to be chosen as the winner of an American Journalism Online Award for Best Non-profit News Source. Thanks to everyone for reading & supporting SCOTUSblog, including on our opinion-day live blogs, which the awarding judge called a "digital townsquare." #AJOawards
The winner of the award for Best Non-Profit News Source is @scotusblog. Judge @juliachanb called the site “a crucial tool in a political journalist’s toolbox” and praised their recent site revamp and dedication to transparency. https://www.scotusblog.com 2/
Quick Tok explainer on yesterday’s voting rights case at the Supreme Court—Merrill v. Milligan.
The Mar-a-Lago case arrives at the Supreme Court. Here's an explainer on today's filing from @katieleebarlow, who notes that this isn't the first time Trump has asked the justices to intervene in fights over sensitive documents. (Both other times, the court ruled against him.)
In today's Voting Rights Act case, the conservative majority seemed likely to side with Alabama, though perhaps on narrower grounds than the state asked for. Here's @AHoweBlogger's analysis, plus courtroom sketches from Bill Hennessy (AKA @Artisbest).
Conservative justices seem poised to uphold Alabama’s redistricting plan in Voting Rights Act challenge - SCOTUSblog
In February, a divided Supreme Court temporarily blocked a ruling by a three-judge district court in Alabama, which ...
BREAKING: Donald Trump's lawyers have filed an emergency request asking the Supreme Court to intervene in the case over classified documents at Mar-a-Lago. Trump wants SCOTUS to vacate a Sept. 21 ruling by the 11th Circuit. Here is the filing: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/22A283.pdf
Today at SCOTUS: voting rights and veterans' benefits.
First up is Merrill v. Milligan, a case about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and how to decide if a state's redistricting plan dilutes Black voting power. @AHoweBlogger explains:
When are majority-Black voting districts required? In Alabama case, the justices will review that question. - SCOTUSblog
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act bars election practices that result in a denial or abridgement of the right ...