|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|20-5||D.C. Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2020|
Issue: Whether legislators have standing to seek judicial relief when their votes have been “completely nullified” under Raines v. Byrd.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 06 2020||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 10, 2020)|
|Jul 30 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 10, 2020 to September 9, 2020, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 31 2020||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including September 9, 2020.|
|Aug 07 2020||Brief amicus curiae of The Niskanen Center filed.|
|Aug 10 2020||Brief amici curiae of Harold H. Bruff, Peter M. Shane, Peter L. Strauss, and Paul R. Verkuil filed.|
|Aug 10 2020||Brief amici curiae of Bipartisan Former Members of Congress filed.|
|Aug 10 2020||Brief amici curiae of Scholars of Standing, Federal Jurisdiction, and Constitutional Law filed.|
|Aug 10 2020||Brief amici curiae of Legal Historians filed.|
|Sep 09 2020||Brief of respondent Trump, Donald in opposition filed.|
|Sep 22 2020||Reply of petitioners Richard Blumenthal, et al. filed. (Distributed)|
|Sep 23 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020.|
|Oct 13 2020||Petition DENIED.|
Released today: annual financial disclosures for eight of the nine justices. Key takeaways: substantial book-royalty income for Sotomayor and Gorsuch; reduced travel reimbursements across the board during the pandemic.
Full story from @AHoweBlogger:
Less travel, plenty of royalties for justices in 2020 - SCOTUSblog
The effects of the COVID-19 pandemic were reflected in an unusual source: the justices’ 2020 financial disclosur...
Opinions next week — Monday and Thursday at 10:00 a.m. ET.
With 21 opinions to go, #SCOTUS enters the home stretch: Opinions expected on Monday and Thursday again next week, at 10 am Eastern both days. Court will also issue orders from today's conference at 9:30 am on Monday, June 14.
NEW: SCOTUS rules against federal government's interpretation of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Court says a felony involving recklessness does not satisfy the law's "use of physical force" element and thus does not trigger the law's "violent felony" mandatory minimum sentence.
It's a @SCOTUSblog kind of morning
R.I.P. Judge Robert Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit. His influence on SCOTUS and American law was enormous.
The Supreme Court will release opinion(s?) at 10:00 a.m. ET. We’ll fire up the live blog at 9:45.
There are 22 outstanding opinions in argued cases including the Affordable Care Act, LGBTQ+ / religious liberty, voting rights, and student speech. https://www.scotusblog.com/2021/06/announcement-of-opinions-for-thursday-june-10/
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.