|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
Issues: (1) Whether the just-compensation clause prohibits a legislature from limiting how just compensation for a taking is calculated; and (2) whether the just-compensation clause allows the jury to value the fee interest taken as if it were still encumbered by a discontinued highway easement.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Dec 2 2016||Application (16A552) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from February 1, 2017 to March 3, 2017, submitted to Justice Thomas.|
|Dec 7 2016||Application (16A552) granted by Justice Thomas extending the time to file until March 3, 2017.|
|Mar 3 2017||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 6, 2017)|
|Mar 30 2017||Order extending time to file response to petition to and including May 8, 2017.|
|Apr 6 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Pacific Legal Foundation.|
|Apr 6 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Virginia Institute for Public Policy, et al.|
|Apr 6 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by The Cato Institute, et al.|
|May 8 2017||Brief of respondents Mississippi Transportation Commission, et al. in opposition filed.|
|May 15 2017||Reply of petitioner Bay Point Properties, Inc., fka BP Properties, Inc. filed.|
|May 23 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 8, 2017.|
|Jun 6 2017||Rescheduled.|
|Jun 12 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 15, 2017.|
|Jun 19 2017||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of June 22, 2017.|
|Jun 26 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by The Cato Institute, et al. GRANTED.|
|Jun 26 2017||Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Pacific Legal Foundation GRANTED.|
|Jun 26 2017||Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Virginia Institute for Public Policy, et al. GRANTED.|
|Jun 26 2017||Petition DENIED. Statement of Justice Gorsuch, with whom Justice Thomas joins, respecting the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion).|
SCOTUS rules against immigrant who has lived in the US without authorization for decades. The gov't sought to deport him based on a state misdemeanor conviction (he used a fake Social Security card to get a job). SCOTUS says 5-3 he's not eligible to seek protection from removal.
NEW: In Freedom of Information Act case, SCOTUS says federal government does not have to disclose documents that were produced as part of a rulemaking on "cooling water intake structures" under the Clean Water Act. The Sierra Club argued the docs should be disclosed under FOIA.
At 10:00 a.m. EST, the Supreme Court will hand down one or more opinions in argued cases.
We’ll be live blogging through it at 9:45 with @AHoweBlogger, Mark Walsh, and @jamesromoser.
Announcement of opinions for Thursday, March 4 - SCOTUSblog
We will be live blogging on Thursday, March 4, as the court releases opinions from the 2020-21 term. This live ...
SCOTUS will hear oral argument at 10:00 a.m. EST about when claimants must raise claims in the administrative process – “exhausting” their administrative remedies. Read more from Ronald Mann.
It might sound exhausting! But we claim it might be fun.
Justices to weigh issue exhaustion for Social Security claimants - SCOTUSblog
Wednesday’s argument in Carr v. Saul involves a surprisingly basic question of administrative law: when claimants ...
Who you calling “shrinking”? — the shadow docket
With #SCOTUS’s shrinking docket, we have to wonder if @SCOTUSblog will become a bi-monthly publication.
The Supreme Court will take up voting rights this morning.
Oral argument begins at 10:00 a.m. EST.
Justices to consider whether Arizona’s voting rules discriminate against minorities - SCOTUSblog
The 2020 elections may be over, but the Supreme Court will soon hear oral argument in a pair of voting-rights ...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.