|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|18-1587||4th Cir.||Feb 24, 2020||Jun 15, 2020||7-2||Thomas||OT 2019|
Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in this case.
Holding: Because the Department of the Interior’s decision to assign responsibility over the Appalachian Trail to the National Park Service did not transform the land over which the Trail passes into land within the National Park System, the Forest Service had the authority to issue the special use permit.
Judgment: Reversed and remanded, 7-2, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on June 15, 2020. Justice Ginsburg joined the majority opinion as to all but part III-B-2. Justice Sotomayor filed a dissenting opinion, in which Justice Kagan joined.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|May 15 2019||Application (18A1181) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 26, 2019 to June 25, 2019, submitted to The Chief Justice.|
|May 16 2019||Application (18A1181) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 25, 2019.|
|Jun 25 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 29, 2019)|
|Jul 01 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 29, 2019 to August 28, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Jul 02 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC.|
|Jul 05 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 28, 2019.|
|Jul 25 2019||Brief amici curiae of United Association of Journeymen and Appentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of The United States and Canada, AFL-CIO, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of National Association of Manufacturers, et al. filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 26 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 26 2019||Brief amici curiae of American Forest Resource Council et al filed. VIDED.|
|Jul 29 2019||Brief amici curiae of State of West Virginia, et al. filed.|
|Aug 28 2019||Brief of respondents Cowpasture River Preservation Association, et al. in opposition filed. VIDED.|
|Sep 11 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Sep 11 2019||Reply of petitioner Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC filed. VIDED. (Distributed)|
|Oct 04 2019||Petition GRANTED. The petition for a writ of certiorari in No. 18-1584 is granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument.|
|Oct 04 2019||Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 18-1584. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 18-1584. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”|
|Nov 26 2019||SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, February 24, 2020. VIDED.|
|Jan 09 2020||Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit.|
|Jan 21 2020||CIRCULATED|
|Jan 21 2020||The record from the U.S.C.A. 4th Circuit is electronic and located on PACER. Also received from the 4th Circuit are SEALED documents that's been electronically filed.|
|Feb 24 2020||Argued. For petitioners in 18-1584: Anthony A. Yang, Assistant to the Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For petitioner in 18-1587: Paul D. Clement, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Michael K. Kellogg, Washington, D. C. VIDED.|
|Jun 15 2020||Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Breyer, Alito Gorsuch, and Kavanaugh, JJ., joined, and in which Ginsburg, J., joined except as to Part III–B–2. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kagan, J., joined. VIDED.|
|Jul 17 2020||JUDGMENT ISSUED.|
The Supreme Court sides with Sen. Ted Cruz in his First Amendment challenge to a federal campaign-finance law that limits how and when candidates can recoup loans that they make to their own campaigns. The vote is 6-3 along ideological lines.
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.
SCOTUS agrees to take up two new cases: Jones v. Hendrix (a habeas corpus case) and SEC v. Cochran (a case about the power of district courts to hear challenges to the constitutionality of the SEC's administrative law proceedings). Full order list here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/051622zor_hgcj.pdf
We're live now on SCOTUSblog's homepage or at https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us: https://www.scotusblog.com/2022/05/announcement-of-orders-and-opinions-for-monday-may-16/
Today at SCOTUS: The court will issue one or more opinions in argued cases at 10 a.m. EDT. But first, orders on pending petitions at 9:30. We'll fire up our live blog at 9:25 to break it all down and answer your questions. Grab some ☕️ and come join us:
Announcement of orders and opinions for Monday, May 16 - SCOTUSblog
On Monday, May 16, we will be live blogging as the court releases orders from the May 12 conference and opinio...
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.