|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-107||2nd Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge of which the defendant was acquitted by a jury.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2019)|
|Aug 07 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Vincent Asaro.|
|Aug 08 2019||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Aug 12 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Vincent Asaro filed.|
|Aug 13 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Due Process Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Aug 19 2019||Response Requested. (Due September 18, 2019)|
|Sep 10 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 18, 2019 to October 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 18, 2019.|
|Sep 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Sep 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Federal Defenders and FAMM filed.|
|Oct 04 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2019 to November 12, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 12, 2019.|
|Nov 12 2019||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Nov 18 2019||Reply of petitioner Vincent Asaro filed.|
|Nov 18 2019||Waiver of 14-day waiting period for distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Dec 03 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||Petition DENIED.|
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.