|Docket No.||Op. Below||Argument||Opinion||Vote||Author||Term|
|19-107||2nd Cir.||N/A||N/A||N/A||N/A||OT 2019|
Issue: Whether the Fifth and Sixth Amendments prohibit a federal court from basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on conduct underlying a charge of which the defendant was acquitted by a jury.
|Date||Proceedings and Orders |
|Jul 22 2019||Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 21, 2019)|
|Aug 07 2019||Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Vincent Asaro.|
|Aug 08 2019||Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.|
|Aug 12 2019||Supplemental brief of petitioner Vincent Asaro filed.|
|Aug 13 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Due Process Institute filed. (Distributed)|
|Aug 14 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/1/2019.|
|Aug 19 2019||Response Requested. (Due September 18, 2019)|
|Sep 10 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 18, 2019 to October 18, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Sep 11 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 18, 2019.|
|Sep 18 2019||Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed.|
|Sep 18 2019||Brief amici curiae of The National Association of Federal Defenders and FAMM filed.|
|Oct 04 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 18, 2019 to November 12, 2019, submitted to The Clerk.|
|Oct 07 2019||Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 12, 2019.|
|Nov 12 2019||Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.|
|Nov 18 2019||Reply of petitioner Vincent Asaro filed.|
|Nov 18 2019||Waiver of 14-day waiting period for distribution of the petition under Rule 15.5 filed.|
|Nov 26 2019||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2019.|
|Dec 03 2019||Rescheduled.|
|Jan 15 2020||DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/21/2020.|
|Feb 24 2020||Petition DENIED.|
A week from today, the Supreme Court will hear argument on the scope of the Second Amendment's right to bear arms. It's a case that could ultimately determine the fate of many gun-control measures around the country. Here's our preview, from @AHoweBlogger:
In major Second Amendment case, court will review limits on carrying a concealed gun in public - SCOTUSblog
The Second Amendment guarantees “the right of the people to keep and bear arms.” On Nov. 3, the Suprem...
The court has rescheduled oral argument in Shinn v. Ramirez, an important case involving habeas rights and the death penalty, for Dec. 8.
#SCOTUS also issues revised December argument calendar, adding Shinn v. Ramirez (moved to December from November to accommodate Texas cases) on Dec. 8: https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/10-26-21-Amended-DEC-2021-Monthly-Argument-Session-Calendar.pdf
#SCOTUS issues order on divided argument in next week's Texas abortion cases, allows Texas to file one consolidated (but oversized) brief for both cases: https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/courtorders/102621zr_o7jp.pdf
Happening now outside SCOTUS: Several dozens supporters of expanding the size of the court are holding a rally. Speakers include Sen. Ed Markey, Sen. Tina Smith, and Rep. Mondaire Jones.
On Friday, the Supreme Court moved the Texas abortion litigation off the shadow docket and onto the "rocket docket." @maryrziegler explains how the expedited schedule is an important shift from how the court initially handled the issue in early September.
Supreme speed: The court puts abortion on the rocket docket - SCOTUSblog
Mary Ziegler is a law professor at Florida State University and the author of Abortion and the Law in America: ...
The court has adjusted its November argument schedule to reflect the accelerated consideration of the Texas abortion law.
#SCOTUS issues new oral argument calendar for November in light of today's orders scheduling Texas abortion cases for Nov. 1. Ramirez v. Collier, originally scheduled for Nov. 1, is now set for Nov. 9; Shinn v. Ramirez, originally set for Nov. 1, will be argued in December.