Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20-1775 | 9th Cir. | Feb 23, 2022 | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2021 |
Issue: (1) Whether states with interests should be permitted to intervene to defend a rule when the United States ceases to defend.
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
Jun 18 2021 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2021) |
Jul 09 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2021 to August 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk. |
Jul 12 2021 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2021, for all respondents. |
Aug 23 2021 | Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. |
Aug 23 2021 | Brief of respondents State of California et al. in opposition filed. |
Aug 23 2021 | Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed. |
Aug 23 2021 | Brief of respondents Washington et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed) |
Sep 08 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021. |
Sep 08 2021 | Reply of petitioners Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Oct 04 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021. |
Oct 12 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021. |
Oct 25 2021 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/29/2021. |
Oct 29 2021 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. |
Dec 13 2021 | Brief of petitioners Arizona, et al. filed. |
Dec 13 2021 | Joint appendix filed. |
Dec 14 2021 | Blanket Consent filed by Petitioner, Arizona, et al. |
Dec 17 2021 | ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, February 23, 2022. |
Dec 17 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of America First Legal Foundation filed. |
Dec 20 2021 | Brief amicus curiae of Immigration Reform Law Institute filed. |
Dec 20 2021 | Brief amici curiae of Ohio, et al. filed. |
Dec 21 2021 | Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit. |
Dec 21 2021 | The record from the U.S.C.A. 9th Circuit is electronic and located on Pacer. |
Dec 21 2021 | The record from the U.S.D.C. Eastern District of Washington (Richland) is electronic and located on Pacer. |
Jan 12 2022 | Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco and County of Santa Clara filed. |
Jan 12 2022 | Brief of State Respondents filed. |
Jan 12 2022 | Brief of Federal Respondents filed. |
Jan 18 2022 | CIRCULATED |
Jan 19 2022 | Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General. |
Jan 24 2022 | Motion for divided argument filed by the Solicitor General GRANTED. |
Feb 11 2022 | Reply of petitioner Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
Feb 17 2022 | Letter of the Solicitor General updating on status of availability of NPRM text. (Distributed) |
Feb 23 2022 | Argued. For petitioners: Mark Brnovich, Attorney General, Phoenix, Ariz. For federal respondents: Brian H. Fletcher, Principal Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For state respondents: Helen H. Hong, Deputy Solicitor General, San Diego, Cal. |
We can announce, however, that we'll be liveblogging the release of orders from today's conference AND opinions, starting at around 9:25 @SCOTUSblog. Please join us to discuss the leak, pending opinions, and whatever other SCOTUS-related issues are on your mind. https://twitter.com/AHoweBlogger/status/1524788054434660353
#SCOTUS will release opinions from argued cases at 10 am on Monday. The Court does not announce in advance how many opinions it will release or which ones.
NEW: Next Monday will be a Supreme Court opinion day. Starting at 10 a.m. EDT, the court expects to issue one or more decisions in argued cases from the current term.
Just in: The Supreme Court denies a request to block the execution of Clarence Dixon, an Arizona man who is scheduled to be put to death today. Dixon's attorneys argued that, because of a mental illness, Dixon is not mentally fit to be executed under the Eighth Amendment.
On this date in “How Appealing” history: At this very moment twenty years ago, this blog came into existence, boosting your humble author from nearly total obscurity to perhaps a modicum less than nearly total obscurity.
On this happy occasion, I once https://howappealing.abovethelaw.com/2022/05/06/#179553
How the unprecedented Supreme Court leak may have been a response to an earlier disclosure about the justices' private deliberations. @TomGoldsteinSB on what it all means for the court and its secrets.
How the leak might have happened - SCOTUSblog
Among the debates generated by the leak of Justice Samuel Alito’s opinion in Dobbs is whether the leaker was...
www.scotusblog.com
JUST IN: The Supreme Court confirms the authenticity of the draft opinion revealed last night by Politico. The chief justice has ordered an investigation into the leak.