Breaking News

Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco, California

Pending petition
Docket No. Op. Below Argument Opinion Vote Author Term
20-1775 9th Cir. TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD

Issues: (1) Whether states with interests should be permitted to intervene to defend a rule when the United States ceases to defend; (2) whether the Department of Homeland Security's final rule interpreting the statutory term “public charge” is contrary to law or arbitrary and capricious; and (3) whether the decision below as to the rule should be vacated as moot under United States v. Munsingwear.

DateProceedings and Orders (key to color coding)
Jun 18 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 23, 2021)
Jul 09 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2021 to August 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
Jul 12 2021Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 23, 2021, for all respondents.
Aug 23 2021Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
Aug 23 2021Brief of respondents State of California et al. in opposition filed.
Aug 23 2021Brief of respondents City and County of San Francisco, et al. in opposition filed.
Aug 23 2021Brief of respondents Washington et al. in opposition filed. (Distributed)
Sep 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
Sep 08 2021Reply of petitioners Arizona, et al. filed. (Distributed)
Oct 04 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
Oct 12 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/15/2021.