Arctic Cat Inc. v. Bombardier Recreational Products Inc.
Petition for certiorari dismissed pursuant to Rule 46 on November 10, 2020
Issue: Whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit erred in holding that "notified of the infringement" and "such notice" under 35 U.S.C. § 287(a) refer only to communications from the patent owner.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Petitions of the week: Bad Spaniels, false testimony and more (Andrew Hamm, October 16, 2020)
| Date | Proceedings and Orders |
|---|---|
| 09/14/2020 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 19, 2020) |
| 09/17/2020 | Waiver of right of respondents Bombardier Recreational Products Inc., et al. to respond filed. |
| 09/23/2020 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/9/2020. |
| 09/28/2020 | Response Requested. (Due October 28, 2020) |
| 09/28/2020 | Brief amicus curiae of Lambeth Magnetic Structures, LLC filed. |
| 10/06/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 28, 2020 to December 7, 2020, submitted to The Clerk. |
| 10/07/2020 | Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including December 7, 2020. |
| 11/05/2020 | Motion to dismiss in accordance with Rule 46.1 filed. |
| 11/10/2020 | Petition Dismissed - Rule 46. |