M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. Tackett
Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
13-1010 | 6th Cir. | Nov 10, 2014 | Jan 26, 2015 | 9-0 | Thomas | OT 2014 |
Holding: To determine whether retiree health-care benefits survive the expiration of a collective bargaining agreement, courts should apply ordinary contract principles. Those principles do not include the Sixth Circuit"s inference that parties to collective bargaining would intend retiree benefits to vest for life.
Judgment: Vacated and remanded, 9-0, in an opinion by Justice Thomas on January 26, 2015.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Opinion analysis: Justices reject presumption of health-benefit vesting, calling for analysis under ordinary contract principles (Ronald Mann, January 26, 2015)
- Argument analysis: Justices dust off contracts treatises for dispute over health-benefit vesting (Ronald Mann, November 11, 2014)
- Argument preview: Justices to consider vesting of health-care benefits (Ronald Mann, November 7, 2014)
- New amicus brief: A broader view of retiree health care (Thomas Hopson, July 25, 2014)
- Petition of the day (Maureen Johnston, April 24, 2014)
Date | Proceedings and Orders |
---|---|
01/10/2014 | Application (13A753) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from January 20, 2014 to February 20, 2014, submitted to Justice Kagan. |
01/16/2014 | Application (13A753) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until February 20, 2014. |
02/20/2014 | Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 26, 2014) |
03/26/2014 | Brief of respondents Hobert Freel Tackett, et al. in opposition filed. |
04/07/2014 | Reply of petitioners M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. filed. |
04/09/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of April 25, 2014. |
04/28/2014 | DISTRIBUTED for Conference of May 2, 2014. |
05/05/2014 | Petition GRANTED limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. |
05/09/2014 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is extended to and including July 10, 2014. |
06/20/2014 | Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the petitioners. |
07/08/2014 | Consent to the filing ofamicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for the respondents. |
07/10/2014 | The time to file the joint appendix and petitioners' brief on the merits is further extended to and including July 17, 2014. |
07/10/2014 | The time to file respondents' brief on the merits is extended to and including September 15, 2014. |
07/17/2014 | Joint appendix filed. (Statement of costs filed) |
07/17/2014 | Brief of petitioners M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. filed. |
07/24/2014 | Brief amici curiae of Council on Labor Law Equality and the Society for Human Resource Management filed. |
07/24/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., in support of neither party filed. |
07/24/2014 | Brief amici curiae of ERISA Industry Committee and the American Benefits Council filed. |
07/24/2014 | Brief amici curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, and the Business Roundtable filed. |
07/24/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Manufacturers filed. |
07/24/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of Whirlpool Corporation filed. |
09/04/2014 | SET FOR ARGUMENT on Monday, November 10, 2014. |
09/08/2014 | Record requested from U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit. |
09/15/2014 | Brief of respondents Hobert Freel Tackett, et al. filed. |
09/15/2014 | Record received from U.S.C.A. 6th Circuit is electronic. |
09/19/2014 | CIRCULATED |
09/22/2014 | Brief amici curiae of Labor and Benefits Law Professors filed. (Distributed) |
09/22/2014 | Brief amici curiae of Fox Retiree Committee, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
09/22/2014 | Brief amicus curiae of American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations filed. (Distributed) |
10/15/2014 | Reply of petitioners M&G Polymers USA, LLC, et al. filed. (Distributed) |
11/10/2014 | Argued. For petitioners: Allyson N. Ho, Dallas, Tex. For respondents: Julia P. Clark, Washington, D. C. |
01/26/2015 | Judgment VACATED and case REMANDED. Thomas, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. Ginsburg, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan, JJ., joined. |
02/27/2015 | JUDGMENT ISSUED. |