Editor's Note :

close editor's note Editor's Note :

There is a possibility of opinions on Thursday at 10 a.m. We will begin live-blogging at 9 a.m. at this link, where readers can also sign up for an email reminder when we start the live blog.
Our statistics page presents the data on each sitting – the cases (14 remain undecided) and the majority-opinion authors.

Briefly Mentioned :

Briefly Noted :

Justice Elena Kagan has called for a response in the sanctuary-cities case from Chicago to the federal government’s request that the Supreme Court limit the reach of a nationwide injunction barring the government from imposing conditions on federal grants for police.

Miriam Seifter Guest

Miriam Seifter is an Assistant Professor of Law at the University of Wisconsin Law School, where she teaches courses in Administrative Law, Energy Law, and Property Law. Her scholarly interests include administrative law, environmental and energy law, and federalism. Her recent work focuses on the role of states and interest groups in the federal regulatory process.

Professor Seifter received a B.A. magna cum laude from Yale University, an M.Sc. with distinction from Oxford University, and a J.D. magna cum laude from Harvard Law School, where she was the Environmental Fellow and an Articles Editor on the Harvard Law Review. After law school, she served as a law clerk for Chief Judge Merrick Garland on the D.C. Circuit and for Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg at the Supreme Court of the United States. Prior to joining the UW Law faculty, she was a Visiting Researcher and Adjunct Professor of Law at Georgetown University Law Center and worked in private practice at Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP in San Francisco.

Date Post Title
Next Page »
06.12.18 Opinion analysis: Court affirms without opinion in tribal-fishing-rights case
04.19.18 Argument analysis: Court debates standard for violating tribal fishing rights
04.11.18 Argument preview: Justices to consider the scope of tribal fishing rights
01.22.18 Opinion analysis: Challenges to the WOTUS rule must begin in district court
10.12.17 Argument analysis: Wading through the “themeless pudding” of Clean Water Act jurisdiction
10.05.17 Argument preview: Justices to determine how Clean Water Act litigation flows
06.23.17 Opinion analysis: In regulatory takings case, court announces a new test
03.21.17 Argument analysis: Justices search for a common denominator in takings case
03.14.17 Argument preview: Defining the denominator in regulatory takings law
06.01.16 Opinion analysis: Narrow loss for the government in Clean Water Act finality case
Term Snapshot
Awards