15 articles
Today we hosted a 30-minute webinar discussing Wednesday’s faithless elector cases, Chiafalo v. Washington and Colorado Department of State v Baca. Amy Howe of Howe on the Court and Cathy Ruffing of Street Law led an interactive discussion with middle school students about the arguments made in these cases and the possible implications for the Electoral College.
Today we held a 30-minute webinar discussing Tuesday’s oral arguments in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP & Trump v. Vance. Amy Howe and Steven Mazie of Bard High School Early College led an interactive discussion with middle school students about what happened in oral argument and possible consequences for the separation of powers.
Today we hosted a 30-minute webinar debriefing Monday’s oral argument in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru. Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell and Daniel Mach of the American Civil Liberties Union discussed what happened at oral argument, possible outcomes and implications for the separation of church and state.
Today we held a 30-minute webinar reviewing yesterday’s oral argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Sarah Harrington of Goldstein & Russell and Bob Anderson of the University of Washington School of Law and Harvard Law School led an interactive discussion with high school students about the argument and the implications of the case for Indian law.
Today we hosted a 30-minute webinar on the upcoming faithless elector cases, Chiafalo v. Washington and Colorado Department of State v Baca. Amy Howe of Howe on the Court and Cathy Ruffing of Street Law led an interactive discussion with middle school students about the electoral college and the questions presented in these cases.
Today we held a webinar discussing Wednesday’s oral argument in Little Sisters of the Poor v. Pennsylvania. Eric Citron of Goldstein & Russell and Nelson Tebbe of Cornell Law School led a discussion for law school students on possible outcomes and how the case may fit in to the Supreme Court’s religious freedom jurisprudence.
Today we held a webinar to debrief Wednesday’s oral argument in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School and Amanda Shanor of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School talked about how the argument went, possible outcomes and impacts on First Amendment jurisprudence.
Today we hosted a 30-minute webinar before Tuesday’s oral arguments in Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP & Trump v. Vance. Amy Howe and Steven Mazie of Bard High School Early College led an interactive discussion with middle school students, starting with a discussion of separation of powers and then addressing questions raised in these cases.
Today at 2:00 p.m., we held a 30-minute webinar before Monday’s oral argument in McGirt v. Oklahoma. Sarah Harrington of Goldstein & Russell and Bob Anderson of Harvard Law School led an interactive discussion with high school students, starting with a preview of the case and then covering tribal sovereignty and the history of Native American reservations.
Today at 1:00 p.m., we held a 30-minute webinar before the oral argument next Monday, May 11, in Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-Berru. Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell and Daniel Mach of the American Civil Liberties Union led an interactive discussion with high school students, starting with a preview of the case and then addressing questions related to the separation of church and state.
Today at noon, we held a video discussion of yesterday’s first-ever telephonic oral argument, in U.S. Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com. Tejinder Singh of Goldstein & Russell and John Duffy of the University of Virginia School of Law talked about the new argument format and what the case may mean for trademarks in marketing and advertising.
Today at noon, we held a webinar before the oral argument in Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants. Tom Goldstein, Genevieve Lakier of the University of Chicago Law School and Amanda Shanor of the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School led a discussion for law school students on the First Amendment.