Pung v. Isabella County, Michigan
| Docket No. | Op. Below | Argument | Opinion | Vote | Author | Term |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25-95 | 6th Cir. | Feb 25, 2026 | TBD | TBD | TBD | OT 2025 |
Issues: (1) Whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment when the compensation is based on the artificially depressed auction sale price rather than the property’s fair market value; and (2) whether the forfeiture of real property worth far more than needed to satisfy a tax debt but sold for a fraction of its real value constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment, particularly when the debt was never actually owed.
SCOTUSblog Coverage
- Court announces it will hear case on gun rights among several others in February sitting (Amy Howe, January 2, 2026)
- Supreme Court to hear cases on guns, government confiscation, and several other issues (Amy Howe, October 3, 2025)